Quadratic with simple meaningful intuitive constants

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PaulDiddams
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constants Quadratic
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a novel approach to modeling quadratic functions by utilizing intuitive constants instead of traditional coefficients a, b, and c. The author, known as "Diddams," proposes using the intercept (Yo) and the coordinates of the maxima or minima (Xm, Ym) to simplify the fitting process. This method has been in use for over 30 years and is presented as a powerful tool for both educational and practical applications in quadratic modeling.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quadratic functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with mathematical modeling techniques
  • Basic knowledge of intercepts and extrema in functions
  • Experience with rearranging equations for problem-solving
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Diddams equation" and its applications in quadratic modeling
  • Explore methods for calculating maxima and minima in quadratic functions
  • Learn about the significance of intercepts in mathematical modeling
  • Investigate educational techniques for teaching quadratic functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics educators, students studying quadratic functions, and researchers in mathematical modeling will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in innovative approaches to teaching and applying quadratic equations.

PaulDiddams
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
A simple quadratic rearrangement that uses the intercept and the values of x and y that define the maxima or minima, in place of a, b and c, to drive a quadratic function. (demo Excel sheet attached).
Ever made a simple model that fits a quadratic function?

Tweaking the a, b and c constants to fit new observed data is a bit of a pain.

When I was a grad. student I came up with the following simple quadratic rearrangement that uses the intercept (Yo) and the values of x and y that define the maxima or minima (Xm, Ym) in place of non-intuitive a, b and c constants to drive the quadratic function. I also include rearrangements to calculate x from y, or Yo which I often find very useful too.

I would appreciate being credited "Diddams equation" if you choose to use my rearrangement. I think it's really neat and very powerful.

Enjoy.

1649843609412.png
 

Attachments

Mathematics news on Phys.org
That's a simple rearrangement exercise for high school, done millions of times before.
Naming things after yourself is frowned upon by the way. Even if it were something new.
 
mfb said:
That's a simple rearrangement exercise for high school, done millions of times before.
Naming things after yourself is frowned upon by the way. Even if it were something new.
I've been using this rearrangement for over 30 years now and neither I nor anyone I know has ever seen it done before, and my colleagues have been referring to it by that name for point of reference. If you have references where it's been done and shared before I'm interested to see them.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
35K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K