B Quadratic with simple meaningful intuitive constants

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter PaulDiddams
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constants Quadratic
AI Thread Summary
A simple model for fitting quadratic functions using intuitive constants has been proposed, replacing traditional constants a, b, and c with the intercept (Yo) and the coordinates of the maxima or minima (Xm, Ym). This rearrangement simplifies the process of adjusting the quadratic function to fit new data. The creator, who has used this method for over 30 years, requests that it be credited as the "Diddams equation." Despite its simplicity, the rearrangement is presented as a powerful tool for calculations, particularly in educational contexts. The discussion also touches on the convention against naming mathematical concepts after oneself, despite the creator's belief that this approach is unique.
PaulDiddams
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
A simple quadratic rearrangement that uses the intercept and the values of x and y that define the maxima or minima, in place of a, b and c, to drive a quadratic function. (demo Excel sheet attached).
Ever made a simple model that fits a quadratic function?

Tweaking the a, b and c constants to fit new observed data is a bit of a pain.

When I was a grad. student I came up with the following simple quadratic rearrangement that uses the intercept (Yo) and the values of x and y that define the maxima or minima (Xm, Ym) in place of non-intuitive a, b and c constants to drive the quadratic function. I also include rearrangements to calculate x from y, or Yo which I often find very useful too.

I would appreciate being credited "Diddams equation" if you choose to use my rearrangement. I think it's really neat and very powerful.

Enjoy.

1649843609412.png
 

Attachments

Mathematics news on Phys.org
That's a simple rearrangement exercise for high school, done millions of times before.
Naming things after yourself is frowned upon by the way. Even if it were something new.
 
mfb said:
That's a simple rearrangement exercise for high school, done millions of times before.
Naming things after yourself is frowned upon by the way. Even if it were something new.
I've been using this rearrangement for over 30 years now and neither I nor anyone I know has ever seen it done before, and my colleagues have been referring to it by that name for point of reference. If you have references where it's been done and shared before I'm interested to see them.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
34K
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Back
Top