A Quadrupole radiation formula for gravity

Kostik
Messages
250
Reaction score
28
TL;DR Summary
Some help needed converting the formula for quadrupole radiation from geometrized units (##c=G=1##) to conventional units.
I derived the formula for the quadrupole radiation power emitted by a system of masses:
$$P=\frac{1}{45}\dddot{Q}_{kl}\dddot{Q}_{kl} .\quad\quad (*)$$ Note here that: (1) I am using geometrized units, so ##c=G=1##; (2) ##Q_{kl}## is the quadrupole tensor $$Q_{kl} = \int{(3x_k x_l - δ_{kl}\cdot r^2 )ρ} \, dV \quad (r^2\equiv x_k x_k)$$ and (3) repeated indices are summed over. (In Euclidean space ##R^3##, all indices are subscripts.)

This is essentially the same formula given by Landau & Lifshitz "Classical Theory of Fields, 4th Ed." (Eq. (110.16), p. 355) and Ohanian & Ruffini "Gravitation and Spacetime" (Eq. (5.75), p. 195): $$P=\frac{G}{45c^5}\dddot{Q}_{kl}\dddot{Q}_{kl} .$$ Landau & Lifshitz keep all factors of ##c## and ##G##, while Ohanian uses ##c=1## but keeps ##G## separate.

What I want to do is simply convert from geometrized units to conventional units, which means ##t## should be replaced by ##ct## and mass ##m## (or mass density ##\rho##) should be replaced by ##Gm/c^2## (or ##G\rho/c^2##).

Where I'm having trouble is that the power formula has a product ##\dddot{Q}_{kl}\dddot{Q}_{kl}##. So it seems to me that the correct way to convert ##(*)## to conventional units would be
$$P=\frac{1}{45} \left( \frac{G}{c^5} \right)^2 \dddot{Q}_{kl}\dddot{Q}_{kl} .$$ Obviously, this is wrong -- only one factor of ##G/c^5## should be used, which is also consistent with dimensional analysis. (In geometrized units, both sides of ##(*)## are dimensionless.)

I'm just not seeing why I should only add one factor of ##G/c^5##, when surely each factor of ##\dddot{Q}_{kl}## carries its own factor of ##G/c^5##? What am I missing here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You just have to insert the factors of ##G## and ##c## so the dimensions match correctly. You know that ##[G/c^5] = M^{-1} L^{-2} T^3##. You also know that ##[\dddot{Q}] = [P] = ML^2 T^{-3}##, so ##[P]/[\dddot{Q}]^2 = M^{-1} L^{-2} T^3 = [G/c^5]##
 
Kostik said:
only one factor of ##G/c^5## should be used
But you have to also convert the LHS of the equation to conventional units, so one factor of ##G/c^5## goes on the LHS, and cancels one of the two factors of ##G/c^5## on the RHS, so the end result is one factor of ##G/c^5## on the RHS, as the references you give say.
 
  • Like
Likes phyzguy and Kostik
PeterDonis said:
But you have to also convert the LHS of the equation to conventional units, so one factor of ##G/c^5## goes on the LHS, and cancels one of the two factors of ##G/c^5## on the RHS, so the end result is one factor of ##G/c^5## on the RHS, as the references you give say.
Thank you!
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top