Qualitative Explanation of Range

  • Thread starter Thread starter tmobilerocks
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explanation Range
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion explains how projectiles can achieve the same range despite differing launch angles by analyzing the components of initial velocity. Specifically, it highlights that the x-component of velocity determines the horizontal distance traveled, while the y-component affects the airtime. Two projectiles, one launched at 45 degrees and the other at 60 degrees, can have the same range if their x-components of velocity are equal, demonstrating the independence of the x and y components in projectile motion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of projectile motion principles
  • Familiarity with vector components and unit vectors
  • Basic knowledge of trigonometry, specifically arctangent functions
  • Concept of parabolic trajectories in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the equations of motion for projectiles in physics
  • Learn about the effects of air resistance on projectile trajectories
  • Explore advanced projectile motion simulations using tools like PhET Interactive Simulations
  • Investigate the impact of varying initial velocities on range and trajectory
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching projectile motion, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of motion in two dimensions.

tmobilerocks
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Explain qualitatively how it is possible for the projectiles to have the same range despite having different launch angles


Homework Equations


x = voxt


The Attempt at a Solution


A projectile's range is determined by its x component of the initial velocity and the airtime. A projectile can either have a large x-component of its initial velocity, and a short airtime, or a small x-component of its initial velocity and a long airtime. Therefore, they will have the same range.

Is there a better explanation than this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Qualitatively:

You have to imagine the fact that in let's say a 2-dimensional plane where the projectile flies, there are two perpendicular directions. Because of this fact, the y-component of velocity is completely independent of the x-component. It only controls motion in the vertical direction; try thinking of each component as if the other were set to zero.

For example, if v_{ox} were set to 0, the projectile would go up, then fall right back down. Now if you slowly increase v_{ox} you will basically be spreading out the rise and fall over more space. The rise and fall will still take exactly the same time as if there were no x-component. In the case where there is an x-component it just will not land where it started!


Mathematically:

The same initial x-component of velocity will lead to the same range, because they correspond to different angles. For example let's say you have two different projectiles with the same initial x-velocity:

<br /> v_1=[\hat{x}+\hat{y}] m/s<br />

<br /> v_2=[\hat{x}+\sqrt{3}\hat{y}] m/s<br />

If you haven't been introduced to unit vectors, all these \hat{x},\hat{y} symbols mean basically are x-component and y-component respectively.

So for example with v_1 projectile the initial velocity is 1 m/s in the x-direction, and 1 m/s in the y-direction.

The v_2 projectile has an initial velocity of 1 m/s in the x-direction and \sqrt{3} m/s in the y-direction.

So the second projectile has much more speed in the y-direction than the first projectile. The angle of both can be found from simple trigonometry:

<br /> \theta_1 = \arctan{1} = \frac{\pi}{4} = 45^\circ<br />

<br /> \theta_2 = \arctan{\sqrt{3}} = \frac{\pi}{3} = 60^\circ<br />

So visually you should picture the parabolic path of the projectile, and imagine the two roots of the parabola being it's initial position on the ground, and it's final position. The 45^\circ velocity will be much lower to the ground during its flight but will have the same roots as the parabola that had an initial angle 60^\circ. All that changed was how high it went, which was determined by the differing y-component. The x-component just changed how much over it went, which was in this case exactly the same!

I hope this was clear!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
27K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K