Quantized space-time and redshift.

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the implications of quantized space-time, particularly in the context of Loop Quantum Gravity and Spin Foam theories. It posits that if space-time is quantized at the Planck scale, then light from distant stars, originating in younger domains with smaller units of space-time, would be redshifted as it traverses larger, older units. This redshift is explained by the need for photons to maintain a constant speed while crossing expanding space-time, which would require a decrease in their energy and frequency. The conversation also touches on how mass can distort space-time, potentially affecting light's properties without invoking gravity. Overall, the idea suggests a complex interplay between space-time quantization, redshift, and the nature of mass in the universe.
  • #31
turbo-1 said:
Here's a link to an article about a bright young Greek Physicist working in Canada. There are still experiments in the works that might probe the fine structure of spacetime...GLAST (scheduled for 2006) may be able to detect whether gamma rays of very short wavelength can be slowed by interference with space-time at very small scales.

http://www.greece.gr/GLOBAL_GREECE/SPOTLIGHT/thinkingatthespeedoflight.stm?content_ID=16
One piece of good news - for some of us! - is that the only likely accessible* regime where LQG, String/M Theory, whatever, may be tested (in the next century or three) is high energy astrophysics (and gravity wave detectors) - GLAST, AMANDA, the various cosmic ray observatories (including the gamma ones); LISA, LIGO, ... If history is any guide, anyone of these will quite likely turn up quite unanticipated phenomena (and maybe also constrain some 'unified physics' out of the ballpark), showing yet again that the universe is richer, more complex, more wonderful than we puny Homo sap. mammals can even imagine.

*some possible 'local' ones: investigations into short-range deviations from inverse square for gravity, something unexpected from the LHC, even a 'routine' two-more-decimal-points study of something already 'well known'
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
454
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K