Quantum eraser input polarization

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the polarization states of photons produced by a BBO (Beta Barium Borate) crystal in quantum optics. Participants clarify that photons can be polarized orthogonally, with Type I crystals producing parallel polarization (HH) and Type II crystals yielding a superposition of horizontal and vertical polarizations (HV and VH). The role of a Quarter-Wave Plate (QWP) is also examined, emphasizing that it produces circularly polarized light only when oriented at 45 degrees to the incoming polarization; otherwise, it results in elliptical or linear polarization. The conversation concludes that the polarization direction is dependent on the crystal type and the QWP's orientation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of photon polarization and quantum optics concepts
  • Familiarity with BBO (Beta Barium Borate) crystals and their types
  • Knowledge of Quarter-Wave Plates (QWP) and their operational principles
  • Basic principles of interference patterns in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between Type I and Type II BBO crystals in quantum optics
  • Study the effects of Quarter-Wave Plates on photon polarization
  • Explore the implications of polarization states in Bell tests
  • Investigate the mathematical representation of superposition in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, optical engineers, and students studying quantum optics who seek to deepen their understanding of photon polarization and its applications in experiments like Bell tests.

gespex
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I'm a bit confused about the polarization state of the photons after the BBO. I am aware that they are polarized orthogonally, but are they polarized according to a certain axis?

The reason I'm asking is that one article I read seems to imply that that's not the case: i.e. the polarizations are orthogonal, but they may still be at any angle. However, Wikipedia states that the QWP produces circularly polarized photons. But if I'm not mistaken, a QWP only produces circularly polarized photons if the angle of the QWP is exactly 45 degrees relative to the photon's polarization. Otherwise it will produce elliptically polarized photons, or even linear if the incoming angle is exactly that of the QWP.

So which of the two is true? By the looks of it they are always parallel to either the x or the y axis, but it can be either for either particle. Is that true?

Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There is one polarization direction where QWP1 gives clockwise polarized light and QWP 2 gives counterclockwise polarized light (and therefore no interference). Incoming light perpendicular to that direction will give the opposite: CCW at QWP1 and CW at QWP 2 (and again no interference).
You can write a linear polarization as superposition of those.

What about a different axis to look at?
Consider light, polarized along the fast axis of QWP1: It will stay polarized, and the same happens at QWP2, but they get a relative phase shift of 1/4 wave and the interference pattern moves a bit relative to a regular double slit.
Now, consider light polarized along the slow axis of QWP1: It is similar to above, but the phase shift and the shift of the interference pattern is in the other direction - you get light where the other part is dark and vice versa. And the sum of both is "no interference" again.

Quantum magic :D.
 
gespex said:
Hi all,

I'm a bit confused about the polarization state of the photons after the BBO. I am aware that they are polarized orthogonally, but are they polarized according to a certain axis?

Good question, and the answer is both yes and no. It depends on the type of crystal used. Usually called Type I and Type II, here is what you have:

Type I: Photon pair comes out polarized in a known direction parallel to each other, ie HH>
Type II: Photon pair comes out polarized in a superposition of HV> and VH>

Type II is suitable for a Bell test as is. Type I requires 2 crystals oriented orthogonally to get a HV> + VH> superposition.

Going back to your question: they do always come out as H or V and so the QWP can do its thing with no problem.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
7K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 79 ·
3
Replies
79
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
2K