Quantum field theory vs. super string theory?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter BadgerBadger92
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
BadgerBadger92
Messages
217
Reaction score
133
I know that a particle or wave (correct me if I’m wrong) is an excitation of underlying quantum fields.

Then there’s string theory which says that particles are “strings.”

Are these two theories connected in some way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BadgerBadger92 said:
I know that a particle or wave (correct me if I’m wrong) is an excitation of underlying quantum fields.

Then there’s string theory which says that particles are “strings.”

Are these two theories connected in some way?
Hello, you may have heard of the AdS=CFT correspondence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AdS/CFT_correspondence. This correspondence shows that string theory and quantum field theory are capable of generating the same predictions and results, under specific conditions and versions of string theory and quantum field theory.
 
Demystifier said:
Even without AdS/CFT correspondence, QFT is obtained from string theory as an approximation, in the limit in which wavelength is much larger than the string length.
Genuine question since I'm no expert. Is this true of all string theories? Or does one use this limit to reduce the space of possible string theories?