Quantum Mechanics Boundary conditions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on clarifying doubts regarding boundary conditions in quantum mechanics, specifically in Step 3 of a problem. Participants emphasize the importance of clearly stating the doubt to facilitate assistance. The solution involves using two separate wave functions for different regions, with each function representing waves in both directions. At the boundary, the wave functions must be equal, and this equality can be evaluated at the boundary point. The conversation highlights the necessity of matching both the wave functions and their derivatives at the boundary for a complete solution.
MaxJ
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
below
Relevant Equations
below
For this problem,
1723530036965.png

The solution is,
1723530056524.png

1723530081396.png

1723530099482.png

1723530114429.png

I have a doubt about Step number 3 about boundary conditions. Someone maybe be able to solve that doubt?

Kind wishes
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MaxJ said:
I have a doubt about Step number 3 about boundary conditions. Someone maybe be able to solve that doubt?
Not unless you tell us what your actual doubt is. The math is straightforward, essentially plug-and-chug.
 
Orodruin said:
Not unless you tell us what your actual doubt is. The math is straightforward, essentially plug-and-chug.
Sir, bless you.

Doubt is matching wave functions give A + B = C + D and how they get their expression for derivatives (also in step 3).
 
MaxJ said:
Doubt is matching wave functions give A + B = C + D and how they get their expression for derivatives (also in step 3).
It would be more conventional (and clearer) to consider 2 separate wave-functions, one for each region: ##\psi_1## for ##x<0## and ##\psi_2## for ##x \ge 0##.

Each wave-function contains 2 terms, representing waves moving in the +x and -x directions in that region.

So, adapting your solution’s notation:
##\psi_1(x) = A e^{ikx} + Be^{-ikx}##
##\psi_2(x) = C e^{iqx} + De^{-iqx}##

At ##x=0## we require that ##\psi_1 =\psi_2##. Simply evaluate ##\psi_1##and ##\psi_2## at ##x=0## and equate them.

Similarly for the dervatives.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
Back
Top