Quantum Mechanics - Comparing Rayleigh-Jeans formula with Planck's

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the frequency range where the Rayleigh-Jeans formula approximates the Planck blackbody spectrum within 10%. The relevant equations are the Planck formula, given by p(v)dv = (8πh/c^3)(v^3/(e^(hv/kT)-1))dv, and the Rayleigh-Jean formula, expressed as p(v)dv = (8πkT/c^3)(v^2)dv. Participants suggest using a percentage error approach to compare the two formulas and recommend expressing the difference in terms of x = hν/kT for simplification. The consensus is that an exact solution for x is unlikely, and approximations should be considered.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Planck's Law and Rayleigh-Jeans Law
  • Familiarity with blackbody radiation concepts
  • Basic knowledge of calculus and algebra
  • Experience with mathematical software like Mathematica for complex equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the derivation of Planck's Law and its implications for blackbody radiation
  • Study the limitations of the Rayleigh-Jeans Law at high frequencies
  • Learn about numerical methods for approximating solutions to complex equations
  • Investigate the use of Mathematica for solving physics-related equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those studying thermodynamics and quantum mechanics, as well as educators looking to deepen their understanding of blackbody radiation theories.

Cimster
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Over what range in frequencies does the Rayleigh-Jeans formula give a result within 10% of the Planck blackbody spectrum?


Homework Equations



Planck Formula:

p(v)dv = \frac{8πh}{c^3}(\frac{v^3}{e^(hv/kT)-1})dv


Rayleigh-Jean Formula:

p(v)dv = \frac{8πkT}{c^3}(v^2)dv


The Attempt at a Solution



I've used the Rayleigh-Jean and Planck blackbody formulas, so I'm not unfamiliar with them. But I'm not even sure where to start with this question. The only two approaches I can think of are to start arbitrarily picking frequency values, solving both equations, and test for the percent errors... or to combine the two formulas along with the percentage error formula in a massively complex equation that I would need Mathematica to solve, which can't possibly be the correct way of going about it.

I have a feeling that I'm going to kick myself over this, but can someone provide me with some guidance on how to go about this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Write an equation expressing that the difference between the two distributions is 10% of the Planck distribution. Simplify as far as possible.

For convenience let x = h\nu/kT and write the equation in terms of x.

I think you'll end up with an equation that cannot be solved exactly for x, as you suspected. See if you can think of a way to find a good approximate solution for x without resorting to Mathematica.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
866
Replies
8
Views
18K
Replies
3
Views
3K