Quantum Mechanics Effects: Proton vs Up Quark

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter susskind99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Effects Qm
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the quantum mechanical uncertainty associated with protons and up quarks, exploring the implications of quantum uncertainty on their respective sizes and behaviors. Participants examine the relationship between quantum uncertainty and the definitions of size in quantum systems, referencing experimental observations and theoretical calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that a proton's location does not exhibit significant quantum uncertainty compared to that of an up quark, suggesting specific scales for quantum uncertainty.
  • Others challenge this view, citing experimental evidence of quantum effects in protons and larger systems, indicating that quantum uncertainty applies broadly.
  • A participant presents a mathematical expression for calculating the uncertainty of position in quantum states, suggesting that uncertainty is typically comparable to the size of the quantum system.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the size of a quantum system is defined by the uncertainty of its constituents' positions, linking this to the observed dimensions of atoms.
  • One participant counters that experimental results, particularly from scattering experiments, provide a basis for understanding the sizes of quantum systems, suggesting that definitions in quantum mechanics align with empirical findings.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the extent of quantum uncertainty in protons versus up quarks, with some asserting limited uncertainty for protons and others arguing for broader applicability of quantum effects. The discussion remains unresolved with competing perspectives on the definitions and implications of size in quantum mechanics.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various scales of quantum uncertainty and the definitions of size in quantum systems, but there are unresolved assumptions regarding the applicability of these concepts across different particles. The discussion includes both theoretical and experimental perspectives that may not fully align.

susskind99
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I'm pretty sure a proton's location does not have much quantum uncertainty but an up quark does. So qm uncertainty begins around 10^-15m and is full blown at 10^-18m

If my numbers are wrong please let me know.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
susskind99 said:
I'm pretty sure a proton's location does not have much quantum uncertainty but an up quark does. So qm uncertainty begins around 10^-15m and is full blown at 10^-18m

If my numbers are wrong please let me know.

Your assumptions are wrong. We have seen interference effects on not only protons, but also molecules as big as buckyballs.

Thus, quantum effects (and consequently, the HUP) apply to protons and much bigger sizes.

Zz.
 
The uncertainty of the position x of a quantum object in a certain state psi can be calculated as

##\Delta x^2 = \langle\psi|(x-\bar{x})^2|\psi\rangle##

Usually what you find is an uncertainty comparable to the typical size S of the quantum system. So the uncertainty of an electron in an atom / of a proton inside a nucleus / of a quark inside a proton is comparable to the size S of the atom / nucleus / proton.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
tom.stoer said:
Usually what you find is an uncertainty comparable to the typical size S of the quantum system. So the uncertainty of an electron in an atom / of a proton inside a nucleus / of a quark inside a proton is comparable to the size S of the atom / nucleus / proton.
By definition. The "size of a quantum system" is defined by the uncertainty of the position of its constituents. We say an atom is an Angstrom in diameter because that describes the region in which the electrons can be found.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Bill_K said:
By definition. The "size of a quantum system" is defined by the uncertainty of the position of its constituents. We say an atom is an Angstrom in diameter because that describes the region in which the electrons can be found.
No, by experiment ;-)

We see structures in scattering experiments which can be (approximately) explained by (e.g.) charge distributions. The typical size of these distributions can be derived from the experiments. The calculations result in comparable sizes, thefore the idea of what "size" could mean, the experimental results and the definitions used in QM agree.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K