Quantum mechanics Hermitian operator

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 2K views
binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



I have the criteria:

## <p'| L_{n} |p>=0 ##,for all ##n \in Z ##

##L## some operator and ## |p> ##, ## |p'> ##some different physical states

I want to show that given ## L^{+}=L_{-n} ## this criteria reduces to only needing to show that:

##L_n |p>=0 ## for ##n>0 ##

Homework Equations


look up , look down,

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
##<p'|L_n|p>^{+}=<p|L_n^{+}|p'>=<p|L_{-n}|p'>##

So from this I can deduce that showing :

##<p'|L_n|p>^{+}## is satisfied is equivalent to showing that ##<p|L_{-n}|p'>## is satisfied.

I.e I can reduce the criteria from showing for all ##n \in Z## to showing for ##n>0## only, BUT I am still sandwiched between two different physical states, I don't understand how this means you can reduce further to showing only that ##L_n |p>=0##, ##n >0 ## acting on solely a ket/bra...

Many thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So I don't understand some of your notation. Do you mean [itex]L_n^\dagger = L_{-n}[/itex]? Also are [itex]|p>[/itex] and [itex]|p'>[/itex] arbitrary? It seems like having an operator act on a ket and then taking the inner product always giving zero would mean the operator gives zero on the ket. All the extra parts about [itex]n[/itex] aren't really relevant. You can consider one [itex]n[/itex]. If [itex]L_n=0[/itex] the you can show [itex]L_{-n}[/itex] =0 if they are related by conjugation.
 
Dazed&Confused said:
So I don't understand some of your notation. Do you mean [itex]L_n^\dagger = L_{-n}[/itex]? Also are [itex]|p>[/itex] and [itex]|p'>[/itex] arbitrary?

yes
Dazed&Confused said:
It seems like having an operator act on a ket and then taking the inner product always giving zero would mean the operator gives zero on the ket.

mm I thought the idea for using two different states ## |p'> ## and ## |p> ## is to show that this result holds for general arbitrary states, rather than showing that ##<p|L_n|p> = 0 ## . I agree that if we wanted to show that this was zero then ##L_n|p> = 0## is enough for the inner product to be zero.
Dazed&Confused said:
All the extra parts about [itex]n[/itex] aren't really relevant. You can consider one [itex]n[/itex]. If [itex]L_n=0[/itex] the you can show [itex]L_{-n}[/itex] =0 if they are related by conjugation.

yup
 
I just can't imagine a situation where if [itex]<p|L_n|p'>=0[/itex] for all [itex]|p>[/itex] and [itex]|p'>[/itex] and they aren't equal that [itex]L_n \neq 0[/itex]. For example say [itex]|p'> = L_n|p>[/itex]. I mean it must be some state right? Then the condition implies [itex]<p'|p'> =0[/itex] which by the properties of vector implies [itex]|p'> = L_n |p> =0[/itex].