Quantum Mechanics: Outside a (in)Finite Well

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the wavefunction behavior in an infinite potential well, specifically why ψ approaches 0 for x<0 and x>L. Participants clarify that constants C and D must be set to zero outside the well to satisfy boundary conditions. The wavefunction must be normalizable, which eliminates exponential terms that diverge at infinity. The solution arises from applying the Schrödinger equation, ensuring that the wavefunction remains valid within the defined limits. Overall, the key takeaway is the necessity of adjusting constants to adhere to the physical constraints of quantum mechanics.
WWCY
Messages
476
Reaction score
15

Homework Statement


Referencing image attached.

Screen Shot 2017-08-12 at 3.35.11 PM.png


I'm not sure how the example arrived at ψ ⇒ 0 at x<0 and >L as K ⇒ ∞ in the limiting case of an infinite potential well.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried simply applying limits to the wavefuction but in the case x<0, the answer I was arriving at was simply ∞ as the term with constant C approaches 0 and the term with constant D approaches ∞.

I'm also clueless as how ψ ⇒ 0 for x>L.

Can anyone help point out what I'm missing? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,
From the explanation at (b) you see that D = 0 for x < 0 . Idem C = 0 for x > 0.
Why this is so is indeed not mentioned. So: how can they claim that ?
 
I see it now, thank you for the insight!

BvU said:
Hi,
Why this is so is indeed not mentioned. So: how can they claim that ?

I assume that this is a possible solution arising out of the Schrodinger equation for a 1D finite well, and that C and D are adjusted to ensure that this wavefunction meets boundary conditions? Is this answer somewhat correct?
 
The wavefunction has to be normalizable. That excludes terms ##e^{+x}## on the far right and ##e^{-x}## on the far left.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K