Quantum Mechanics - quick integral question.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of probability density for a quantum mechanical system involving hydrogen atom energy eigenfunctions. The original poster is attempting to find the probability density as a function of the angle θ after combining multiple wave functions. The context involves integrating over spherical coordinates, specifically focusing on the variables r and Ø while considering the normalization of the eigenfunctions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to integrate the combined wave functions over the spherical coordinates to find the probability density. Some participants question the validity of the integration limits and the volume element used in the calculations. Others suggest clarifying the definitions of the variables involved and the implications of orthogonality and normalization of the eigenfunctions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the integration process and the implications of the spherical harmonics involved. There is a recognition of the need to clarify the volume element and its relation to the probability density function. Some guidance has been offered regarding the proper setup of the integrals, but a consensus on the correct approach has not yet been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem involves specific wave functions and their combinations, with attention drawn to the normalization constants and the assumptions made about the spherical symmetry of the system. There is an emphasis on the need to derive the correct volume element in spherical coordinates and how this affects the integration process.

binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12
ψnlm, ψnlm', ψnlm'' are energy eigenfunctions of hydrogen, and a function of r, θ and Ø.

(they all have the same n and l, but different m's)

I am given ψ(r,t=0)=ψnlm+ψnlm'+ψnlm'' .

I am after the probability density as a function of θ, and so need to integrate over r and Ø.

I have been introduced to ψnlm=Rnl(r)Θlm(θ) ϕm(Ø)

I am checking my understanding of integration tecniques

First of all, energy eigenfunctions are orthogonal when integrated over all space in r/θ/Ø.

So I integrate over Ø and attain |RnlΘlm|^2+|RnlΘlm'|^2+|RnlΘl m''|^2

Which is fine, so now I need to integrate over r.


∫ ( |RnlΘlm|^2+|RnlΘlm'|^2+|RnlΘl m''|^2 ) r^2 dr. *

But I know that Rnl(r),Θlm(θ), ϕm (Ø) are separately normalised.

So ∫ (Rnl)^2 r^2 dr =1 ( Here Rnl is real ! )

So from * I atttain :

|Θlm|^2+|Θlm'|^2+|Θlm''|^2

which gives me the wrong answer.

If anyone could help shed some light on this, that would be greatly appreciated !

The correct solution uses the orthogonal tecnique, and then continues explicitly , as a pose to using the normalization technique, so I suspect this may be were I am going wrong...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Aside: you can place LaTeX expressions between double-dollar signs
##\renewcommand{\F}{\mathrm{\Phi}}
\renewcommand{\T}{\mathrm{\Theta}}
\renewcommand{\R}{\mathrm{R}}
\renewcommand{\dr}{\mathrm{\;\mathrm{d}r}}
\renewcommand{\dth}{\mathrm{\;\mathrm{d}\theta}}
\renewcommand{\dph}{\mathrm{\;\mathrm{d}\phi}}##
$$\psi_{nlm}=\R_{nl}(r)\T_{lm}(\theta)\F_m(\phi)$$

You appear to have done:
$$p(\theta)=\int_0^\infty \int_0^\pi |\Psi(\vec r, t=0)|^2 r^2\dph\dr$$ ... the question that immediately springs up is: where does the ##r^2## come from? The volume element has an ##r^2 \sin\theta## in it... I suspect you just need to be more rigorous with your definitions.
 
But I only want to integrate over r and ϕ as I am after a p(θ)?
 
##\renewcommand{\F}{\mathrm{\Phi}}
\renewcommand{\T}{\mathrm{\Theta}}
\renewcommand{\R}{\mathrm{R}}
\renewcommand{\d}{\mathrm{\;\mathrm{d}}}
\renewcommand{\dr}{\mathrm{\;\mathrm{d}r}}
\renewcommand{\dth}{\mathrm{\;\mathrm{d}\theta}}
\renewcommand{\dph}{\mathrm{\;\mathrm{d}\phi}}##
binbagsss said:
But I only want to integrate over r and ϕ as I am after a p(θ)?
That's right.

Normally $$P_{vol} = \iiint_{vol}|\Psi(\vec r)|\d\tau$$ ... which is to say: the probability of finding the particle in a specified volume is the integral over that volume of the square-modulus of the position-wavefunction.

The volume is indicated by ##\tau## because ##V## is already used in context to represent a potential.
##\d\tau = r^2\sin\theta\dr\dth\dph## would be the volume element in spherical coordinates.
(Where does that ##r^2## come from? Can you derive this volume element?)

You want to find ##p(\theta)##, which is not the same thing.
Can you express ##p(\theta)## in words: what does this bunch of symbols mean?

You seem to be thinking that you should do the above volume integral except for the ##\theta## part ... but (a) that is not what you did above and (b) does that make sense? But I cannot actually tell what you are thinking ... if you don't answer questions, I cannot help you.
 
a) That is what I was thinking, and I am struggling to see how this is not what I did.
b) I think I see now, this doesn't make any sense at all as r^2 is not a volume element.

I thought this part wouldn't be relevant to my issue, but due to the volume element I now see it was - the question asked to find the probability density functin as a function of μ, where μ=cosθ, st θ terms no longer appear:

|dμ|=sinθ

D(μ)dμ = [itex]\int\int[/itex](ψnlm+ψnlm'+ψnlm'')*(ψnlm+ψnlm'+ψnlm'') r^2 dr dμ dø
=> D(μ) = [itex]^{2∏}_{0}[/itex][itex]\int[/itex][itex]^{∞}_{0}[/itex][itex]\int[/itex](ψnlm+ψnlm'+ψnlm'')*(ψnlm+ψnlm'+ψnlm'') r^2 dr dø.

which was my starting point.
 
binbagsss said:
a) That is what I was thinking, and I am struggling to see how this is not what I did.
b) I think I see now, this doesn't make any sense at all as r^2 is not a volume element.
##r^2\,dr## has units of volume.

I thought this part wouldn't be relevant to my issue, but due to the volume element I now see it was - the question asked to find the probability density functin as a function of μ, where μ=cosθ, st θ terms no longer appear:
You can also write the volume element as ##d\tau = r^2\,dr\,d(\cos\theta)\,d\phi## where the limits for ##\cos\theta## run from -1 to 1.

|dμ|=sinθ
You mean ##d\mu = \sin\theta\,d\theta##. You can't have a lone differential.

D(μ)dμ = [itex]\int\int[/itex](ψnlm+ψnlm'+ψnlm'')*(ψnlm+ψnlm'+ψnlm'') r^2 dr dμ dø
=> D(μ) = [itex]^{2∏}_{0}[/itex][itex]\int[/itex][itex]^{∞}_{0}[/itex][itex]\int[/itex](ψnlm+ψnlm'+ψnlm'')*(ψnlm+ψnlm'+ψnlm'') r^2 dr dø.

which was my starting point.
You said your answer was incorrect. How do you know? What are you supposed to get?
 
r[itex]^{2}[/itex] dr is not the relevant volume element - here derived from the Jacobian for spherical coordinates.

The solution I am trying to follow uses the method in post 5, where sin/cos [itex]\theta[/itex] and d[itex]\theta[/itex] terms no longer appear.

As in post 1 I thought it was a later step where I went wrong - the orthogonal or normalisation assumptions/knowledge application.

The solution attains a number as the answer, whereas I attain a function of [itex]\theta[/itex]. (the wave functions are all specified).
 
binbagsss said:
r[itex]^{2}[/itex] dr is not the relevant volume element - here derived from the Jacobian for spherical coordinates.
No one said it was. You seemed to have implied that ##r^2## wasn't correct because it didn't have units of volume. I was pointing out the volume element includes ##dr## so that the units work out.

The solution attains a number as the answer, whereas I attain a function of [itex]\theta[/itex]. (the wave functions are all specified).
Did you provide us with the complete problem statement? I don't see how you can get just a number if ##l## isn't specified and you're not integrating over ##\theta##.
 
I saw that, and the reply was merely aimed to be a correction in recognition of your point.

All n,l,m are specified with the wave functions.

Here's the complete problem statement:

ψ[itex]_{210}[/itex]=[itex]\sqrt{\frac{1}{2a^{3}\pi}}[/itex][itex]\frac{r}{4a}[/itex]exp[itex]^{\frac{-r}{2a}}[/itex]cos[itex]\theta[/itex]

ψ[itex]_{211}[/itex]=[itex]\sqrt{\frac{-1}{a^{3}\pi}}[/itex][itex]\frac{r}{8a}[/itex]exp[itex]^{\frac{-r}{2a}}[/itex]sin[itex]\theta[/itex]exp[itex]^{i\phi}[/itex]

ψ[itex]_{21-1}[/itex]=ψ[itex]^{*}[/itex][itex]_{211}[/itex]

ψ[itex]_{(\underline{r},t=0)}[/itex]=[itex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}[/itex](ψ[itex]_{210}[/itex]+ψ[itex]_{211}[/itex]+ψ[itex]_{21-1}[/itex])

The question then is: what is the probability density distribution as a function of μ = cos[itex]\theta[/itex]
 
  • #10
OK, that makes more sense. That combination of spherical harmonics is spherically symmetric, so you should get a uniform distribution as a function of ##\cos \theta##. It seems to me the problem may be that you didn't break up the original wave functions properly into ##R_{nl}(r)##, ##\Theta_{lm}(\theta)##, and ##\Phi_m(\phi)##.
 
  • #11
The only obvious mistake in breaking up the wave function that I can see is where the normalization constant should go.
But regardless of how I do this, I attain a function of θ, rather than 1/2.
 
  • #12
Well, we can't tell what you're doing wrong if you don't show us your work.
 
  • #13
D([itex]\mu[/itex])d[itex]\mu[/itex]=[itex]^{∞}_{0}[/itex][itex]\int[/itex][itex]^{2\pi}_{0}[/itex][itex]\int[/itex]([itex]\psi[/itex][itex]_{210}[/itex]+[itex]\psi[/itex][itex]_{211}[/itex]+[itex]\psi[/itex][itex]_{21-1}[/itex])*([itex]\psi[/itex][itex]_{210}[/itex]+[itex]\psi[/itex][itex]_{211}[/itex]+[itex]\psi[/itex][itex]_{21-1}[/itex]) r[itex]^{2}[/itex]drd[itex]\mu[/itex]d[itex]\phi[/itex]

=> D([itex]\mu[/itex])= ([itex]\psi[/itex][itex]_{210}[/itex]+[itex]\psi[/itex][itex]_{211}[/itex]+[itex]\psi[/itex][itex]_{21-1}[/itex])*([itex]\psi[/itex][itex]_{210}[/itex]+[itex]\psi[/itex][itex]_{211}[/itex]+[itex]\psi[/itex][itex]_{21-1}[/itex]) r[itex]^{2}[/itex]drd[itex]\phi[/itex]

Integrate over [itex]\phi[/itex]:

[itex]^{2\pi}_{0}[/itex][itex]\int[/itex]([itex]\psi[/itex][itex]_{210}[/itex]+[itex]\psi[/itex][itex]_{211}[/itex]+[itex]\psi[/itex][itex]_{21-1}[/itex])*([itex]\psi[/itex][itex]_{210}[/itex]+[itex]\psi[/itex][itex]_{211}[/itex]+[itex]\psi[/itex][itex]_{21-1}[/itex]) r[itex]^{2}[/itex]d[itex]\phi[/itex] = |R[itex]_{21}[/itex][itex]\Theta[/itex][itex]_{10}[/itex]|[itex]^{2}[/itex] + |R[itex]_{21}[/itex][itex]\Theta[/itex][itex]_{11}[/itex]|[itex]^{2}[/itex] + |R[itex]_{21}[/itex][itex]\Theta[/itex][itex]_{1-1}[/itex]|[itex]^{2}[/itex]


Integrate over r:

[itex]^{∞}_{0}[/itex][itex]\int[/itex] = |R[itex]_{21}[/itex][itex]\Theta[/itex][itex]_{10}[/itex]|[itex]^{2}[/itex] + |R[itex]_{21}[/itex][itex]\Theta[/itex][itex]_{11}[/itex]|[itex]^{2}[/itex] + |R[itex]_{21}[/itex][itex]\Theta[/itex][itex]_{1-1}[/itex]|[itex]^{2}[/itex] dr = [itex]^{∞}_{0}[/itex][itex]\int[/itex] |R[itex]_{21}[/itex]|[itex]^{2}[/itex]|[itex]\Theta[/itex][itex]_{10}[/itex]|[itex]^{2}[/itex] + |R[itex]_{21}[/itex]|[itex]^{2}[/itex]|[itex]\Theta[/itex][itex]_{11}[/itex]|[itex]^{2}[/itex] + |R[itex]_{21}[/itex]|[itex]^{2}[/itex]|[itex]\Theta[/itex][itex]_{1-1}[/itex]|[itex]^{2}[/itex] dr

= [itex]^{∞}_{0}[/itex][itex]\int[/itex] |[itex]\Theta[/itex][itex]_{10}[/itex]|[itex]^{2}[/itex]+|[itex]\Theta[/itex][itex]_{11}[/itex]|[itex]^{2}[/itex]+|[itex]\Theta[/itex][itex]_{1-1}[/itex]|[itex]^{2}[/itex]

(by normalisation of Rnl's)

= cos[itex]^{2}[/itex][itex]\theta[/itex] + sin[itex]^{2}[/itex][itex]\theta[/itex] + sin[itex]^{2}[/itex][itex]\theta[/itex]
 
  • #14
You're not getting the normalization of the ##\Theta_{lm}##'s correct.

Take ##\psi_{210}##. The constant at the front of
$$\psi_{210} = \sqrt{\frac{1}{8\pi a_0^3}}\left(\frac{r}{2a_0}\right)e^{-r/2a_0}\cos\theta.$$ is a combination of the normalization constants for ##R_{21}##, ##\Theta_{10}##, and ##\Phi_{0}##. You need to separate them out correctly.
 
  • #15
Thanks for your help, I can see were this is going.
 

Similar threads

Replies
46
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K