Quantum Mechanics - Time evolution operator , bra ket states.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the time evolution of the spin operator \( S_{x} \) with respect to the state \( |\Psi(t)\pm\rangle \). The user derives an expression involving the matrix elements of \( S_{x} \) and questions the treatment of terms \( \langle \uparrow | S_{x} | \uparrow \rangle \) and \( \langle \downarrow | S_{x} | \downarrow \rangle \), which both yield 1. Additionally, the user seeks clarification on the simplification of the \( \pm^2 \) term in their final expression. The calculations utilize the properties of bra-ket notation and the time evolution operator in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics concepts, specifically bra-ket notation
  • Familiarity with the time evolution operator in quantum systems
  • Knowledge of matrix representation of quantum states and operators
  • Basic proficiency in complex exponentials and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the time evolution operator in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the implications of matrix elements in quantum state transitions
  • Explore simplification techniques for expressions involving complex numbers in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the role of spin operators in quantum mechanics, particularly \( S_{x} \)
USEFUL FOR

Quantum mechanics students, physicists working with spin systems, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum state evolution.

binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12
The question is to calculate the time evoution of S_{x} wrt <\Psi(t)\pm l where <\Psi\pm (t) l= ( \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(exp(^{+iwt})< \uparrow l , \pm exp(^{-iwt})<
\downarrow l ) [1]

Sx=\frac{}{2}(^{0}_{1}^{1}_{0} )

Here is my attempt:

- First of all from [1] I see that l \Psi\pm (t) > = ( \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(exp(^{-iwt}) l \uparrow > , \pm exp(^{+iwt}) l
\downarrow > )*

where * denotes transposing the matrix so it's now a column matrix

So <\Psi(t)\pm l Sx l \Psi\pm (t) > = \frac{ħ}{4}( \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(exp(^{+iwt})< \uparrow l , \pm exp(^{-iwt})< \downarrow ) S_{x}( \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(exp(^{-iwt}) l \uparrow > , \pm exp(^{+iwt}) l
\downarrow > )* = \frac{ħ}{4} < \uparrowl S_{x}l \uparrow> \pm exp ^{+iwt}<\uparrow lS_{x} l \downarrow> \pm exp ^{-iwt}< \downarrowl S_{x}l \uparrow> \pm^{2}<\downarrow lS_{x} l \downarrow>

= \frac{ħ}{4} ( 1 \pm exp ^{+iwt}<\uparrow lS_{x} l \downarrow> \pm exp ^{-iwt}< \downarrowl S_{x}l \uparrow> \pm^{2}1)Okay, so my solution goes straight from line 2 to the answer:

= \frac{ħ}{4} ( \pm exp ^{+iwt}<\uparrow lS_{x} l \downarrow> \pm exp ^{-iwt}< \downarrowl S_{x}l \uparrow>)


So my questions are:

- what happends to < \uparrowl S_{x}l \uparrow> and < \downarrowl S_{x}l \downarrow> terms? I multiply the bra and ket matrix explicitly , and attain 1 in both cases, so what has happened to these in the answer?
- Also, the \pm^{2} looks messy. should have i got this? can it be simplified to \pm

Many thanks for any help, greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anyone?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K