Quantum numbers of Landau levels

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the quantum numbers of Landau levels in a two-dimensional system of charged particles subjected to a perpendicular magnetic field. It highlights the degeneracy of states characterized by quantum numbers ##n## and ##m##, where the energy of the state is dependent solely on ##n##. The symmetric gauge for the vector potential is defined as $$\mathbf{A}=\left(-\frac{yB}{2},\frac{xB}{2},0\right)$$, and the Hamiltonian is expressed as $$\hat{H}=\frac{1}{2m} [(-\mathrm{i} \partial_x+q By)^2-\partial_y^2-\partial_z^2]$$. The discussion concludes that the wave functions corresponding to different values of ##m## are indeed the same due to the commutation of the momentum operators in the defined complex plane.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically the concepts of quantum states and operators.
  • Familiarity with Landau levels and their significance in quantum systems.
  • Knowledge of gauge theories and vector potentials in electromagnetic fields.
  • Proficiency in mathematical techniques involving differential equations and harmonic oscillators.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Landau levels in detail, focusing on the role of the magnetic field.
  • Explore the implications of gauge invariance in quantum mechanics and its effects on wave functions.
  • Investigate the mathematical formulation of harmonic oscillators in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the physical significance of degeneracy in quantum systems and its applications.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in the behavior of charged particles in magnetic fields and the mathematical framework of quantum states.

spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
I have been reading about Landau levels for a two-dimensional system of charged particles in a perpendicular magnetic field and I have trouble understanding why there is degeneracy in the system. Let me provide some background to my problem.
In the presence of a magnetic field, the momentum of a charge particle changes from ##p_{i}## to ##\pi_{i}\equiv p_{i}+eA_{i}##, where ##e## is the charge of the particle.

It is also possible to define another kind of momentum ##\tilde{\pi}_{i}=p_{i}-eA_{i}##.For a two-dimensional system with a magnetic field pointing in the ##z##-direction, we can work in the symmetric gauge

$${\bf{A}}=\left(-\frac{yB}{2},\frac{xB}{2},0\right),$$

and define two sets of creation and annihilation operators ##a, a^{\dagger}## and ##b, b^{\dagger}## such that a generic state of the system is given by

$$|n,m\rangle=\frac{a^{\dagger n}b^{\dagger}n}{\sqrt{n!m!}}|0,0\rangle,$$

where ##|0,0\rangle## is the unique ground state annihilated by both ##a## and ##b##.
Now, ##|0,0\rangle## is the unique ground state annihilated by both ##a## and ##b## since ##\pi_{i}## and ##\tilde{\pi}_{i}## commute in the complex plane defined by ##(z=x-iy,\bar{z}=x+iy)## and commuting observables have a common basis of eigenfunctions.

Does this not mean that the quantum numbers labelled by ##n## and ##m## give the same wavefunctions?

Why does the energy of the state depend only on ##n##, but not on ##m##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's much easier to solve the energy-eigen problem in the gauge, where ##\vec{A}## depends only on one spatial component, e.g.,
$$\vec{A}=-By \vec{e}_x,$$
because of the higher symmetry of the corresponding Hamiltonian. In this gauge the Hamiltonian reads
$$\hat{H}=\frac{1}{2m} [(-\mathrm{i} \partial_x+q By)^2-\partial_y^2-\partial_z^2],$$
i.e., you can seek for common eigenvectors of ##\hat{p}_x##, ##\hat{p}_z## and ##\hat{H}##. This leads to the ansatz
$$u_{E,p_x,p_z}(\vec{x})=C \exp(\mathrm{i} p_x x+\mathrm{i} p_y y) Y(y),$$
leading to an effective one-dimennsional harmonic-oscillator energy-eigenvalue problem for ##Y(y)##.

Of course, the energy eigenvalues are gauge invariant, and the wave function transforms with ##\psi'(t,\vec{x})=\exp[\pm \mathrm{i} q\chi(\vec{x})] \psi(t,\vec{x})## while ##\vec{A}'=\vec{A} + \vec{\nabla} \chi##. I'm a bit unsure about the sign in the phase factor. Just figure it out by direct calculation. :wink:
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: Robert Ye and atyy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
645
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K