Quantum Quantum Probability ― Quantum Logic

Click For Summary
A recent discussion centered around a lecture by mathematician Matt Leifer on quantum mechanics (QM) at Chapman University, which primarily focused on the mathematical aspects rather than the philosophical implications of QM. Leifer highlighted the book "Quantum Probability ― Quantum Logic," noting its heavy mathematical content and recommending it as essential reading. After difficulty locating a copy at his university library, he eventually found one and confirmed its mathematical nature. A participant in the discussion purchased the book from Amazon and plans to share their thoughts after reading it. Additionally, there was mention of another work, "Quantum Mechanics as a Theory of Probability" by Itamar Pitowsky, which may also be of interest.
Messages
10,947
Reaction score
3,821
I recently, via Zoom, watched a lecture on QM at Chapman University, supposedly on philosophy and QM. It was by Matt Leifer, a mathematician, so it didn't contain much philosophy but was mostly the math of QM. He talked about several things, but one was a book cited a lot in the literature - Quantum Probability ― Quantum Logic. Evidently, it is nearly all math. So he went to his school library (Chapman University) to get it. It was not there. He searched and searched and eventually found a copy, but it was not easy. When he got it, evidently, it was basically all math, and he now considers it mandatory reading.

I noted Amazon had it, so bought a copy:
https://www.amazon.com.au/gp/product/3662137356?tag=pfamazon01-20

I will let people know what I think when I get it.

Thanks
Bill

 
  • Like
Likes Lord Jestocost
Physics news on Phys.org
The work of Matt Leifer contains a lot of philosophy, just saying.
 
Demystifier said:
The work of Matt Leifer contains a lot of philosophy, just saying.
Thanks for the heads up.

Thanks
Bill
 
Hi All

Just got the book.

So far, it seems as advertised.

I will give a more detailed report later.

Thanks
Bill
 
Im currently reading mathematics for physicists by Philippe Dennery and André Krzywicki, and I’m understanding most concepts however I think it would be better for me to get a book on complex analysis or calculus to better understand it so I’m not left looking at an equation for an hour trying to figure out what it means. So here comes the split, do I get a complex analysis book? Or a calculus book? I might be able to Borrow a calculus textbook from my math teacher study that for a bit and...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
8K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 225 ·
8
Replies
225
Views
14K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
7K