Quantum Quantum Probability ― Quantum Logic

AI Thread Summary
A recent discussion centered around a lecture by mathematician Matt Leifer on quantum mechanics (QM) at Chapman University, which primarily focused on the mathematical aspects rather than the philosophical implications of QM. Leifer highlighted the book "Quantum Probability ― Quantum Logic," noting its heavy mathematical content and recommending it as essential reading. After difficulty locating a copy at his university library, he eventually found one and confirmed its mathematical nature. A participant in the discussion purchased the book from Amazon and plans to share their thoughts after reading it. Additionally, there was mention of another work, "Quantum Mechanics as a Theory of Probability" by Itamar Pitowsky, which may also be of interest.
Messages
10,901
Reaction score
3,782
I recently, via Zoom, watched a lecture on QM at Chapman University, supposedly on philosophy and QM. It was by Matt Leifer, a mathematician, so it didn't contain much philosophy but was mostly the math of QM. He talked about several things, but one was a book cited a lot in the literature - Quantum Probability ― Quantum Logic. Evidently, it is nearly all math. So he went to his school library (Chapman University) to get it. It was not there. He searched and searched and eventually found a copy, but it was not easy. When he got it, evidently, it was basically all math, and he now considers it mandatory reading.

I noted Amazon had it, so bought a copy:
https://www.amazon.com.au/gp/product/3662137356?tag=pfamazon01-20

I will let people know what I think when I get it.

Thanks
Bill

 
  • Like
Likes Lord Jestocost
Physics news on Phys.org
The work of Matt Leifer contains a lot of philosophy, just saying.
 
Demystifier said:
The work of Matt Leifer contains a lot of philosophy, just saying.
Thanks for the heads up.

Thanks
Bill
 
Hi All

Just got the book.

So far, it seems as advertised.

I will give a more detailed report later.

Thanks
Bill
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
25
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
8K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
43
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
225
Views
14K
Replies
69
Views
6K
Back
Top