Quark-Gloun plasma thermodynamics

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mordred
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plasma Thermodynamics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the thermodynamics of quark-gluon plasma (QGP), specifically focusing on the equation of state (EoS) and thermodynamic distribution metrics applicable to QGP. Participants explore the appropriate statistical distributions for describing the behavior of quarks and gluons within this state of matter.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes the difficulty in finding the EoS and thermodynamic metrics for QGP, considering the degeneracy of gluons and quarks based on their properties.
  • Another participant suggests that at the energy levels relevant for reproducing QGP, the Boltzmann distribution may be applicable.
  • A later reply confirms the use of the Boltzmann distribution for quarks and the Bose-Einstein distribution for gluons, referencing an article that supports this distinction.
  • One participant emphasizes that gluons, unlike ordinary particles, do not follow the classical Boltzmann equation due to their non-conservation properties, which is a quantum mechanical characteristic.
  • Another participant expresses confidence in the methodology based on multiple Arxiv papers reviewed, indicating a level of acceptance in the academic community.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriate statistical distributions for quarks and gluons, with some supporting the use of the Boltzmann distribution for quarks and others highlighting the unique nature of gluons that may preclude standard distributions. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the definitive application of these distributions.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various sources, including textbooks and research papers, but there are indications of uncertainty regarding the applicability of specific distribution functions and the EoS for QGP. The discussion reflects a reliance on existing literature while acknowledging the complexity of the topic.

Mordred
Science Advisor
Messages
2,243
Reaction score
169
I know that fermions and bosons can thermodynamics can be calculated via the Fermi-dirac or Bose_Einstein distributions, However I've been having difficulty finding the EoS (Equation of state) and thermodynamic distribution metrics for the quark-Gluon plasma. So far I have the following considerations

For a gluon, there are 2 helicity states and 8 choices of color so we have a total degeneracy of
gb= 16. For each quark flavor, there are 3 colors, 2 spin states, and 2 charge
states (corresponding to quarks and antiquarks) +3 active flavors.

However I'm not sure what metrics to use as neither the fermi-dirac or Bose_Einstein distributions seem to apply. Preference on the metrics to describe as an ideal gas, as well as the appropriate Cosmology EoS forms if possible.

My background knowledge of particle physics is mainly Introduction to particle physics by Griffith, However I have the Fermion and Boson thermodynamic forms from Scott Dodelson's Modern Cosmology and particle physics of the early universe By Uwe-Jens Wiese

http://www.wiese.itp.unibe.ch/lectures/universe.pdf
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I honestly don't remember exactly, but I'm pretty sure that, at the energy at which we reproduce the QGP, you can just safely use the Boltzmann distribution.
 
That hit it thank you very much found numerous links by googling Boltzmann distribution of Quark-Gluon plasma. In this article it defines quarks by the Boltzmann distribution and the gluon via the Bose-Einstein distribution

http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/0607328v1.pdf
 
It sounds reasonable. Gluons (like photons) are not ordinary particle since their number is not conserved, i.e. gluons/photons can be easily emitted/adsorbed and this is deeply quantum mechanical. Therefore its pretty natural that they don't follow the ordinary classical Boltzmann equation.
 
ya several of the papers I looked at have the same distribution functions on each, all of them are Arxiv papers. So I can be fairly confident that the methodology is correct and accepted. Thanks again

edit: the material along with my collection of articles is sufficient to complete my self study of the thermodynamic history of the Universe. So I'm happy
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
10K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
12K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K