The forum discussion centers on the concept of "quark seeding," which involves the theoretical replacement of electrons in a crystal lattice with quarks to alter material properties. Participants debate the validity of Dr. F. Winterberg's 1975 theories, questioning the feasibility of using high-energy lasers to achieve quark interactions and the implications of antiquark mass. Key points include the distinction between the electromagnetic force and the strong force, the impossibility of free quarks, and the need for modern physics understanding to evaluate such speculative ideas.
PREREQUISITESPhysicists, researchers in particle physics, and students interested in advanced theoretical concepts related to quarks and material science.
If you combine random concepts, you rarely get something useful. Especially if you do not know what you combine, this is pointless.Fizica7 said:
Fizica7 said:
Well what I meant is that a CCD gets hit by photons directly, while the tube amplifiers aren't directly detecting the hits by neutrinos but the hits by photons coming from the water/ice volume.jtbell said:By that logic, an ordinary camera doesn't actually detect actual photons, but their effects on a CCD sensor or on silver atoms in photographic film.
Fizica7 said: