The discussion revolves around the concept of "quark seeding," specifically the idea of doping the crystal lattice of solid materials by replacing electrons with quarks. Participants explore theoretical implications, historical references, and the feasibility of such processes within the context of particle physics.
Participants generally disagree on the validity and relevance of historical theories regarding quarks, with some defending Winterberg's ideas while others argue they are outdated. The feasibility of the proposed experiments and the nature of quarks and antiquarks also remain contested, with no consensus reached.
Limitations include unresolved assumptions about the nature of quarks, the applicability of historical theories to modern physics, and the mathematical steps involved in the proposed energy calculations. The discussion reflects a range of interpretations and understandings of particle physics concepts.
If you combine random concepts, you rarely get something useful. Especially if you do not know what you combine, this is pointless.Fizica7 said:
Fizica7 said:
Well what I meant is that a CCD gets hit by photons directly, while the tube amplifiers aren't directly detecting the hits by neutrinos but the hits by photons coming from the water/ice volume.jtbell said:By that logic, an ordinary camera doesn't actually detect actual photons, but their effects on a CCD sensor or on silver atoms in photographic film.
Fizica7 said: