Quarks and isospin ladder operators

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
Xico Sim
Messages
43
Reaction score
4
Hi, guys.

This is actually a question about quantum mechanics, but since the context in which it appeared is particle physics, I'll post it here.
On Thompson's book (page 227, equation (9.32)), we have
$$T_+ |d\bar{u}\rangle = |u\bar{u}\rangle - |d\bar{d}\rangle$$

But I thought ##T_+=T_+(1)\otimes T_+(2)##, and in that case
$$T_+ |d\bar{u}\rangle = -|u\bar{d}\rangle$$

It seems like he uses ##T_+=T_+(1) + T_+(2)##, and I don't know why he does that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I wasn't thinking correctly: I now know the answer. I don't know if I should delete this thread (or even if I can delete it) or if I should answer myself, for others who may have the same question to see...
 
Xico Sim said:
or if I should answer myself, for others who may have the same question to see...
That's the best option, you are certainly not the first or last one with that question.
 
You're right.
Well, since ##T\equiv T(1) + T(2)## (the total angular momentum operator is the sum of the angular momentum operators of each particle), we have
$$T_+\equiv T_1+iT_2=(T_1(1)+T_1(2))+i(T_2(1)+T_2(2))=T_+(1)+T_+(2)$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and mfb