Query regarding Commuting operators

  • Thread starter Thread starter legend
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operators
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
legend
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I am having a problem with a couple of problems involving commutating operators.

Homework Statement


1. How do i find the commutation operators of x and ∂/∂x
2. If the angular momenta about 3 rotational axes in a central potential commute then how many quantum numbers we would get? And why will it be a problem?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


1. For x i think it would be any F(x) is that so?
and for ∂/∂x is it d/dx ?
2. I think we would get 4 quantum numbers , right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
legend said:
1. How do i find the commutation operators of x and ∂/∂x

I'm not entirely sure what this question is asking...is it asking you to find the commutator of [itex]x[/itex] and [itex]\partial/\partial x[/itex], or something else?


2. I think we would get 4 quantum numbers , right?

Why?
 
Thanks for your reply.

Yes, i guess it is asking for the commutator of x and also the commutator of [itex] \partial/\partial x[/itex]

For the number of quantum numbers, we would have the principal quantum number and the three quantum numbers associated with the three components of the angular momentum and the azimuthal quantum number. So , i guess it should be 5 (sorry not 4), is it?
 
legend said:
Yes, i guess it is asking for the commutator of x and also the commutator of [itex] \partial/\partial x[/itex]

Okay, so what is the definition of "commutator" between two operators? Use that definition, and show your calculations!

For the number of quantum numbers, we would have the principal quantum number and the three quantum numbers associated with the three components of the angular momentum and the azimuthal quantum number.

Why do you say this? How are these quantum numbers derived in the first place? Does that derivation hold if [itex][L_i,L_j]=0[/itex]?
 
Thanks for your reply.

gabbagabbahey said:
Okay, so what is the definition of "commutator" between two operators? Use that definition, and show your calculations!
As far as i know, commutation operator for a function would be such that FG - GF = 0, right? Based on that, i figured for [itex] <br /> \partial/\partial x<br /> [/itex]
it would be [itex] <br /> \partial/\partial y<br /> [/itex]
since [itex] <br /> \partial/\partial x<br /> [/itex]([itex] <br /> \partial/\partial y<br /> [/itex]) = [itex] <br /> \partial/\partial y<br /> [/itex]([itex] <br /> \partial/\partial x<br /> [/itex])
And similarly for x and f(x), am i totally of the track here?
Why do you say this? How are these quantum numbers derived in the first place? Does that derivation hold if [itex][L_i,L_j]=0[/itex]?

I don't have much idea about this question actually. :frown:
 
legend said:
am i totally of the track here?

Way off track. Study your textbook/notes!

The commutator of two operators, [itex]F[/itex] and [itex]G[/itex] is defined as [itex][F,G]=FG-GF[/itex]. So, the commutator of [itex]x[/itex] and [itex]\partial/\partial x[/itex] is given by

[tex][x,\partial/\partial x]=x\frac{\partial}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial}{\partial x} x[/tex]

You can simplify this further by applying this commutator to a sample wavefunction and using the product rule to calculate the derivatives involved.

This is an incredibly basic task in operator algebra, so if you can't do it you need to study!