In Griffiths chapter 4 (pg. 179-180) there is an example (Ex. 4.3) that details the expectation value of ## S_x ##, ##S_y##, and ##S_z## of a spin 1/2 particle in a magnetic field. In this example, they find an eigenvector of ## H## (which commutes with ## S_z##) but then use this same eigenvector to compute the expectation value of both ##S_x## and ##S_y##, too. But the three spin operators do not commute. They have different eigenvectors. So what exactly is the significance of computing the expectation values of the two other spin components with this eigenvector that is not an eigenvector of those 2 operators themselves?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I seem to be missing something very fundamental here. What exactly does it mean for an operator to act on a state that is not its own eigenvector (i.e. what is the physical meaning of this value)?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I Non-commuting operators on the same eigenfunctions

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - commuting operators same | Date |
---|---|

I Commuting Operators and CSCO | Feb 20, 2018 |

I Solving the Schrödinger eqn. by commutation of operators | Jan 8, 2018 |

I Why the velocity operator commutes with position (Dirac equation) | Sep 14, 2017 |

I Does a field operator always commute with itself? | Jul 13, 2017 |

I Kinetic and Potential energy operators commutation | Jun 16, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**