Question about a trivial proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter mindCrime
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around proving the identity (x - (x + y)) = -y within the context of a MAT-095: Algebraic Concepts class. The original poster mistakenly assumed the identity to prove the commutative property of addition, which was identified as a common error. A correct approach was suggested, utilizing the axioms of a ring and the definition of subtraction to demonstrate the identity. The poster also sought additional resources for understanding mathematical proofs, indicating a desire to improve their proof skills.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic algebraic operations
  • Familiarity with the commutative property of addition
  • Knowledge of axioms of a ring
  • Basic concepts of mathematical proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the axioms of a ring in detail
  • Learn about proof techniques, including direct proof and proof by contradiction
  • Explore resources like "Math Proofs DeMystified" by Gibilisco for foundational proof concepts
  • Review discrete mathematics textbooks focusing on proof strategies
USEFUL FOR

Students in introductory algebra courses, individuals seeking to improve their proof-writing skills, and anyone interested in foundational mathematical concepts.

mindCrime
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm working on a problem in my MAT-095: Algebraic Concepts class. The overall problem is to prove the Midpoint Formula for finding the midpoint between two points on a line. But in the process of working through the proof I ran into something that I don't really remember very well from the more basic classes... I thought it was true, so I decided to try and prove it to myself. And I came up with something that "proves" what I thought I knew, but I suck at proofs so I wanted to get a little "sanity check" if I could.

Homework Equations



( x - (x + y) ) = -y

I said this was trivial. Heh.

The Attempt at a Solution



subtract x from both sides, yielding

-(x + y) = (-y -x)

distribute out a -1 from the right hand side yielding

-(x + y) = -1(y + x )

fill in the assumed 1 on the left hand side yielding

-1(x + y) = -1( y + x)

divide both sides by -1 yielding

(x + y) = (y + x), which is true by the commutative property of addition.

So, am I right, or did I miss something? Feel free to make fun of my ignorance, my math "skills" are pretty pathetic. :cry:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First off, you've made a common mistake: your proof is backwards! If we assume all of your steps are correct, then you have assumed the truth of the identity

( x - (x + y) ) = -y

and used that to prove the commutative law of addition.

Fortunately, this is easy to fix: every step you used is reversible; you can apply them in opposite order to prove your identity.


Once you make that fix, it is certainly something I would normally accept as proof. I'm not sure just how pedantic you wanted to be, though.

Incidentally, you can do a proof by "calculation":

x - (x+y) = x + -(x+y) = x + (-1)(x + y) = x + ((-1)x + (-1)y)
= x + (-x + -y) = (x + -x) + -y = 0 + -y = -y

I've tried to write it overly pedantically: the only properties I used are the axioms of a ring, the definition of subtraction, and the identity -x = (-1)x.
 
Hurkly,

Thanks. I'm pretty iffy on the whole proof thing.. none of the math classes I've taken, going all the way back to high-school, through college the first time, and now this go around, really talked about proofs much. So I'm kinda trying to teach myself and work at least some of the proof related problems in my text.

I have the book "Math Proofs DeMystified" by Gibilisco, any other resources you guys might recommend for helping a math n00b bridge the gap into understanding proofs and the more formal stuff? There's also some stuff in my old discrete math book on proofs, but we didn't cover it in the class, so I'll probably go back and look at that too.

Thanks again...
 
I can't help with that. But if you go ask it in our general math forum, I'm sure others will do so.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K