Question about computing residues after substitution

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Belgium 12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Computing Substitution
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on computing residues after substituting functions in complex analysis. The original function around the pole z=1 can be expressed as a Laurent series, where the residuum is determined by the coefficient a-1. The correct residuum of the original function is 1, while the residuum after substitution results in 1/2. The key takeaway is that the residuum of the substituted function does not equal the residuum of the original function.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laurent series and their coefficients
  • Knowledge of complex analysis, specifically residues
  • Familiarity with substitution methods in mathematical functions
  • Basic skills in manipulating series and functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Laurent series in complex analysis
  • Learn about residue theorem applications in contour integration
  • Explore substitution techniques in complex functions
  • Investigate examples of residue calculations for various functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of complex analysis, and anyone interested in advanced calculus and residue calculations.

Belgium 12
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Hi members,
See attacged PDF file for my question

Thank you
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
The first option is correct. Your substitution function gives a residuum of 1/2.
Now, you need to transform it to the residuum of the original function.

Your function (around the pol z=1) can be written as a Laurent series: ##f(z)=\sum_{n=-1}^\infty a_n (z-1)^n ##. Note that all terms with n<-1 vanish because z=1 is a pol of first order. The residuum is defined as the first coefficient of the Laurent-series with negative index, i.e. a-1.

Now, you found the residuum of the original function to be 1, i.e. a-1=1.
If you do your substitution in the Laurentseries, namely (z-1)=2u, you will be left with a new Laurent series of a different function: ##g(u)=\sum_{n=-1}^\infty b_n (u-0)^n##, where ##b_n=a_n*2^n##. If you calculate the residuum of g in the usual way, you will get b-1=1/2 (which you got).
Now you just have to calculate a-1 from that.

To explain your error: The residuum of the substituted function is not exactly the same as the residuum of the original function.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara and Belgium 12
Hi,
thank you very much for the answer
Belgium 12
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K