Question about conducting plates

  • Thread starter Thread starter erik_8991
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conducting Plates
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the x-component of the net electric field at x = 0 and the surface charge density σR induced on the right-hand face of an infinite conducting plate placed between two infinite sheets with surface charge densities σ1 and σ2. The correct answer for the electric field at x = 0 is determined to be +7.85 × 105 V/m. For the surface charge density σR, the correct value is +2.00 μC/m2. The application of Gauss' law is emphasized as a critical method for solving these problems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss' law in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with electric field calculations from infinite sheets
  • Knowledge of surface charge density concepts
  • Basic proficiency in electromagnetism equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Gauss' law in various electrostatic configurations
  • Learn about electric field calculations for different charge distributions
  • Explore the concept of induced charge on conductors in electrostatic equilibrium
  • Investigate the effects of multiple charge sheets on electric fields
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, as well as anyone preparing for exams involving electrostatics and electric fields.

erik_8991
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two infinite sheets with surface charge density σ1 and σ2, respectively, are oriented perpendicular to the x-axis. An infinite, conducting slab of thickness a is placed between the charged sheets as shown in the figure. The conducting plate has a net charge per unit area of σC.



Homework Equations



Calculate the x-component of the net electric field at x = 0.

(a) Ex = +7.85 × 105 V/m
(b) Ex = +6.22 × 105 V/m
(c) Ex = +5.65 × 105 V/m
(d) Ex = -2.67 × 105 V/m
(e) Ex = -3.85 × 105 V/m


QUESTION 15**
Calculate the surface charge density σR induced on the right hand face of the conducting plate.

(a) σR = +3.75 μC/m2
(b) σR = +2.00 μC/m2
(c) σR = -1.50. μC/m2
(d) σR = -3.00 μC/m2
(e) σR = -4.25 μC/m2


The Attempt at a Solution



14. for this number, i suppose left part of the conducting plate has the charge density -1.5. that gives the total E at x = 0 equal to 10. i use the formula E = sigma/2Eo = 10/(2*8.85) to get the answer C

15. I have no idea. I thought it was c, but the answer is B.

thank you so much!
 

Attachments

  • showme.pl.gif
    showme.pl.gif
    3.2 KB · Views: 774
Physics news on Phys.org
Apply Gauss' law to the Gaussian cylinder of cross-sectional area da enclosing the left surface of the conducting sheet (ie. ending in the middle of the conducting sheet where the field = 0) and x=0. You know that the net field through the left surface of area da is equal to the field at x=0 (ie. the answer to question 14) and the field through the right surface of area da is 0.

So applying Gauss' law: E_x\cdot da = dq/\epsilon_0 = \sigma_L da/\epsilon_0

which means that \sigma_L = E_x\epsilon_0 (work out the polarity from the direction of the field, which is the direction in which a positive charge would move).

Then it is just a matter of working out what the charge density on the right is so that the total charge density is \sigma_c = -3.0 \mu C

AM
 
Last edited:
erik_8991 said:
14. for this number, i suppose left part of the conducting plate has the charge density -1.5. that gives the total E at x = 0 equal to 10. i use the formula E = sigma/2Eo = 10/(2*8.85) to get the answer C

You don't need to suppose. The electric field induced by an infinite sheet is sigma/e0, regardless of the distance to the sheet. That means the conducting plate induces sigma_c/e0 everywhere except inside the plate, so you can just add up the electric fields and get the anser.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
14K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
21K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
16K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K