Question about coordination number of face centered cubic.

  • Thread starter Thread starter aiklone1314
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cubic
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the coordination number of face-centered cubic (fcc) structures, exploring how to accurately count the number of atoms in contact with a reference atom. Participants are examining the differences between fcc and body-centered cubic (bcc) coordination numbers, and the reasoning behind the established value of 12 for fcc.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the coordination number of fcc, suggesting it could be counted as 13 if considering a face atom as a reference.
  • Another participant clarifies that the coordination number is determined by counting only the atoms that are "touching" the reference atom, excluding the reference atom itself.
  • It is noted that both fcc and hexagonal close-packed (hcp) structures have a coordination number of 12, which is the highest achievable in any packing arrangement.
  • A detailed explanation is provided by a participant on how to calculate the coordination number for fcc, emphasizing the distances involved and the reasoning for excluding certain atoms based on their positions.
  • One participant expresses understanding after the explanations provided, indicating clarity on the topic.
  • Another participant seeks further clarification on how the count reaches 8 and the addition of the next 4 atoms in the calculation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the coordination number for fcc is 12, but there is some disagreement regarding the counting method and the inclusion of certain atoms in the calculation.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the counting process, particularly regarding the exclusion of the opposite face atom and how the total reaches 12. There are also references to the need for a three-dimensional visualization to understand the arrangement of atoms.

aiklone1314
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
May i know how to count the coordination number of fcc?
i know coordination number is count by the number in contact.
i can understand the coordination number of bcc which is 8 , becoz that is 8 number in contact .
but why fcc is 12 , not 13?
i counted it as 13 if we take one face atom as 'reference atom'..
am i count wrongly?
actually how count the coordination number?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi aiklone1314! :wink:

You count the number of atoms "touching" the reference atom, so that doesn't include the reference atom itself. :smile:

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coordination_number" …
… the atoms are represented by touching spheres. In this model the coordination number of an atom is the number of other atoms which it touches.

The highest bulk coordination number is 12 …
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Both fcc and hcp have a co-ordination number 12. The highest co-ordination number you can achieve in any packing is 12. Try it out with a set of ping-pong balls/marbles.
 
First of all, i am assure you that the answer for coordination number of FCC is 12. Here i am to explain to you how am i calculate it. First, now we are dealing with the central atom of any of the face(out of 6, choose 1). The distance from this reference atom(central atom) to the four end of the atom is same, which is a/square root of 2. Thus we have 4 now. Next, consider that the reference atom again, from this atom to the another 4 faces of the cubic( top, bottom, left, right), the distance from the central atom of the 4 faces and our reference atom is a/square root of 2 again! I have calculate it, u may go and check out again in case i wrong. The reason we not consider the opposite face of the reference atom is because the distance from that will be differ, which is a(so that is not in consideration). At this stage, we have 8. Finally, remember we are dealing with 3-D problem, if we attach another cubic( 2 cubic connected side by side now), we can have another 4, making it a total of 12! Remember, from the reference atom, the ends of the new cubic attach is not consider because they are sharing the same node, which means we have already calculate that at the very beginning, which is the 1st 4. We only deal with again from the reference atom to the 4 faces of the new cubic( top, bottom, left and right). Thats it. Hopefully my explanation is correct and can help you all to understand that. Remember, you need imagination of 3-D image when solving problem.
 
thanks all the guys above...i got the meaning now!
 
Hy.I got the idea till the point that we won't consider the opposite face. But after that how 8 still remain and then what about next 4 ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
25K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
17K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
36K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
79K