Question about dimensional analysis

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around dimensional analysis in physics, specifically determining the units of constants in equations of motion and force. The user correctly concludes that the unit of k in the equation x(t) = x(0) + x(0) * k * t^{1.5} is 1/seconds^{1.5}. Additionally, for the force equation F = k*x^n, the unit of k is confirmed as N/(cm^n). The conversation also touches on graphical analysis techniques for converting non-linear data sets into linear equations, emphasizing the use of logarithmic transformations for analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of dimensional analysis in physics
  • Familiarity with equations of motion and force
  • Knowledge of logarithmic functions and their applications in graphing
  • Basic skills in graphical analysis of data sets
NEXT STEPS
  • Study dimensional analysis techniques in physics
  • Learn about logarithmic transformations for data analysis
  • Explore graphical methods for analyzing non-linear relationships
  • Practice problems involving units and dimensional consistency in equations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on dimensional analysis and graphical methods, as well as educators seeking resources for teaching these concepts effectively.

Cade
Messages
90
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have an equation for motion:
x(t) = x(0) + x(0) * k * t^{1.5}
x is in meters and t is in seconds. I have to determine the unit of k.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



x(t) = x(0) + x(0) * k * t^{1.5}
[x(t)] = meters
Therefore, [x(0)] = meters and [x(0) * k * t^{1.5}] = meters
meters * [k] * seconds^{1.5} = meters
meters * (1/seconds^{1.5}) * seconds^{1.5} = meters

Does this mean the the unit of k is 1/seconds^{1.5}, 1/seconds, or something completely different?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You first option is correct 1/s^1.5
 
Thanks, I didn't know if that was possible. I have another question if you could please check:

A force F is equal to k*x^n, where x is in centimeters.

[k*x^n] = N
[k]*(cm^n) = N
[k] = N/(cm^n)

The unit of k is N/(cm^n), is this correct?
 
Last edited:
Yes, you seem to have it sorted out!
 
Great, thanks. I've done far better in more difficult subjects like multivariable calculus, but the lack of a proper instructor for physics has me making stupid mistakes these days. :frown:

Would you happen to know of any online resource where I can practice graphical analysis of equations like these? What I have to do is to take a non-linear data set and convert it to a straight-line equation, determine appropriate units for slope and intercept, and determine values for the constants based on slope and intercepts. I only have two practice problems to work with.
 
I have never looked for any online resources for these types of problems.
If you know the power law for the equation (t^1.5 in your first example, n in your second example) Then the graph to plot is x against t^1.5 for the first and F against x^n for the second.
These would give straight lines with gradient k in each case.
If you do not know the power law... I think that is the case in your second example, you only know it as n then you must take logs :
F = k * x^n
LnF = Lnk + n*Lnx

A graph of LnF against Lnx will be a straight line with gradient n and intercept Lnk from which k can be calculated

Does this make any sense for you, have you met log ~ log graphs
 
I get the hang of those graphs, but I would feel more comfortable with practice. The other problem I have which I can't work is finding the resistivity p of a wire whose resistance R = (4pL)/(pi*d^2)

Plot R on the y-axis and 1/(d^2) on the x-axis to get gradient = 4pL/pi, and then p = gradient/(4L/pi). But I didn't get a correct graph:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=3618742&postcount=3

Hence, that is why I would feel more comfortable with more to practice with. But I understand what you said about log ~ log graphs, I have this problem (the one I made this thread for, not the previous one) fitted into a linear form properly, all the points rest on a straight line.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
854
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K