Question about divergence theorem and delta dirac function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the validity of the divergence theorem in relation to the line integral equating to 4π for any closed surface containing the origin. Participants emphasize the cancellation of the R(r, θ, φ) factors, allowing for the simplification to a spherical surface without loss of generality. The divergence theorem is applied to demonstrate that the total surface integral remains zero when excluding a small spherical cavity at the origin, confirming the integral's value as -4π. Substitution techniques are also discussed, specifically the transformation of vector variables using the chain rule.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the divergence theorem
  • Familiarity with vector calculus and surface integrals
  • Knowledge of spherical coordinates (r, θ, φ)
  • Proficiency in applying the chain rule in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the divergence theorem in various contexts
  • Explore vector calculus textbooks for detailed examples of surface integrals
  • Investigate spherical coordinates and their applications in physics
  • Review substitution methods in calculus, particularly in vector fields
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are looking to deepen their understanding of vector calculus and the divergence theorem, particularly in relation to surface integrals and transformations.

Clara Chung
Messages
300
Reaction score
13
upload_2019-2-13_19-59-47.png

How do you prove 1.85 is valid for all closed surface containing the origin? (i.e. the line integral = 4pi for any closed surface including the origin)
 

Attachments

  • upload_2019-2-13_19-59-47.png
    upload_2019-2-13_19-59-47.png
    30.7 KB · Views: 4,929
Physics news on Phys.org
I would say by inspection, if you note that for a non-spherical surface the R would in fact be a function: ##R(r,\theta,\phi)## and that ##R(r,\theta,\phi)## factors cancel out using the rules of algebra, leaving an integral of angles only.

Since the ##R(r,\theta,\phi)## factors cancel, then you can choose R to be a spherical surface with no loss in generality.

Perhaps, @Mark44 or @fresh_42 have a more rigorous set of steps.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Clara Chung
Clara Chung said:
View attachment 238665
How do you prove 1.85 is valid for all closed surface containing the origin? (i.e. the line integral = 4pi for any closed surface including the origin)

You can use the divergence theorem. Take any volume that includes the origin. To avoid the problem at the origin you could remove a small spherical cavity at the origin. The total surface integral is zero and the surface integral of the small cavity is ##-4\pi##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Cryo, Clara Chung and jedishrfu
PeroK said:
You can use the divergence theorem. Take any volume that does not include the origin. To avoid the problem at the origin you could remove a small spherical cavity at the origin. The total surface integral is zero and the surface integral of the small cavity is ##-4\pi##.
upload_2019-2-14_0-47-2.png

How to get 1.100 from 1.99? I can't find the derivation in the book...
 

Attachments

  • upload_2019-2-14_0-47-2.png
    upload_2019-2-14_0-47-2.png
    25.3 KB · Views: 1,691
Clara Chung said:
View attachment 238678
How to get 1.100 from 1.99? I can't find the derivation in the book...

That's just a substitution ##\vec{r}## to ##\vec{r} - \vec{r'}##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Clara Chung
PeroK said:
That's just a substitution ##\vec{r}## to ##\vec{r} - \vec{r'}##.
How do you do the substitution? Why is it ok to let ##\vec{r}## = ##\vec{r} - \vec{r'}## ? They are not equal..
 
Clara Chung said:
How do you do the substitution? Why is it ok to let ##\vec{r}## = ##\vec{r} - \vec{r'}## ? They are not equal..

In general, if ##f'(x) = g(x)##, then ##f'(x-a) = g(x-a)##. It's a simple application of the chain rule.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K