Question about generators and relations.

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jack3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Generators Relations
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the subgroup M of S_5 generated by two transpositions and its normalizer N. Participants explore how to describe N using generators and relations, the structure of N as a semidirect product of Abelian groups, and the computation of the order of N. The conversation includes considerations of Sylow's theorems and subgroup conjugacy.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes to describe N by generators and relations, suggesting a specific form for M.
  • Another participant questions the initial claims about N, providing an example of an element g that belongs to N and discussing its implications for the structure of N.
  • There are claims regarding the order of M and the constraints on the elements of N, including that no element of N can move 5 and that |N| must be a multiple of 4.
  • Participants discuss potential orders for N, narrowing it down to 4, 8, 12, or 24, and provide reasoning for eliminating some possibilities based on the presence of certain elements.
  • There is a suggestion that N could be a specific type of group based on the number of elements of order 2 it contains, with references to various Abelian group structures.
  • A later reply clarifies a previous typo regarding the notation used for M and N.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the structure and order of N, with no consensus reached on the exact nature of N or its order. There is ongoing debate about the implications of the elements discussed and their relationships to M and N.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of Sylow's theorems in the discussion, and there are references to specific subgroup properties that remain unresolved. The conversation reflects various assumptions about the elements and their interactions within the groups.

Jack3
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I am trying to use generators and relations here.

Let M ≤ S_5 be the subgroup generated by two transpositions t_1= (12) and t_2= (34).

Let N = {g ∈S_5| gMg^(-1) = M} be the normalizer of M in S_5.

Describe N by generators and relations.

Show that N is a semidirect product of two Abelian groups.

Compute |N|.

How many subgroups conjugate to M are there in S_5 ? Why?

(I think Sylow's theorems should be used here.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jack said:
Describe N by generators and relations.

Please, show some work, $\color{red}M\color{black}=\{(1,2)^m(3,4)^n:m,n\in \mathbb{Z}\}$. What do you obtain?
 
Last edited:
Fernando Revilla said:
Please, show some work, $N=\{(1,2)^m(3,4)^n:m,n\in \mathbb{Z}\}$. What do you obtain?

are you sure about this? it seems to me that g = (1 3)(2 4) is an element of N, since:

gt1g-1 = t2

gt2g-1 = t1

g(t1t2)g-1 = t2t1 = t1t2 (since these are disjoint, and thus commute).

perhaps you meant to use "M", instead of "N", N is the normalizer of M, and we might expect to to be a bit larger than M itself (of course it contains M as a subgroup).

i claim it is obvious that |M| = 4, and that M is non-cyclic. i also claim that no element of N can move 5. so |N| is between 4 and 24, and is a multiple of 4. you should prove these things.

this gives 4 possibilities: |N| = 4,8,12, or 24. since i show an element of N not in M above, 4 is off the table. it can be shown by direct computation that:

t1t2g = (1 4)(2 3) is also in N. this gives a second subgroup of N of order 4:

A = {e, (1 2)(3 4), (1 3)(2 4), (1 4)(2 3)}.

some things for YOU to do: show N doesn't contain any 3-cycles. this means |N| cannot be 24 OR 12 (since the only subgroup of order 12 of S4 is A4 which contains ALL 3-cycles).

so |N| = 8, and furthermore N has at least 5 elements of order 2. which group of order 8 could this be?

abelian possibilities:

Z8 (has only one element of order 2), Z4xZ2 (has 3 elements of order 2), Z2xZ2xZ2 (has 7 elements of order 2).

if it turned out N had an element of order 4, it must be non-abelian. does it?

something that may or may not be relevant: Q8 has 6 elements of order 4, and only 1 element of order 2.

finally, if you arrive at the right choice for N, i hope you will clearly see there is an easy way to see it as a semi-direct product of abelian groups (hint: it has a normal subgroup of index 2).
 
Deveno said:
perhaps you meant to use "M", instead of "N",

Of course, just a typo.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
18K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
754
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K