Question about gravitational potential energy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conversion of gravitational potential energy into kinetic energy, specifically regarding a 1000 lb weight free-falling from 660 ft, resulting in 894,289 joules of energy. When the weight descends a 30-degree slope of 1300 ft, it takes 17 seconds, yielding an average power of 53 kW. The conversation clarifies that while most of the energy can be recovered by a mechanical device, inefficiencies will result in some energy loss, and emphasizes that energy is measured in joules, not in watts. The importance of using consistent units, such as pounds and feet, for calculations is also highlighted.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy concepts
  • Familiarity with energy measurement units (joules, watts)
  • Basic knowledge of mechanical systems and energy transfer
  • Ability to perform calculations involving weight and distance in imperial units
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of energy conservation in mechanical systems
  • Learn about the efficiency of energy transfer in mechanical devices
  • Explore the differences between power and energy measurements
  • Investigate the effects of friction and heat loss in energy conversion
USEFUL FOR

Students, engineers, and physics enthusiasts interested in understanding energy conversion, mechanical systems, and the principles of gravitational potential energy.

scott22
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I am wondering how this all works and am hoping to get some guidance. If a 1000 lb weight freefalls vertically from 660 ft the energy is 894,289 joules. If the fall is down a 30 degree slope that is 1300 ft long, then it takes 17 seconds and the potential energy can be said to be 53 KW. If, and I really mean if, I did that math right then my question has to do with converting that 53KW into kinetic energy. If the 1000 lb. weight is brought to a stop by a mechanical device, rather than impacting the earth, does the 53KW transfer to the mechanical device? If so does all or most of it transfer? Secondly, if the mechanical device takes longer than the 17 seconds of freefall to bring the weight to a stop is the 53KW of potential energy still available? My guess is that no matter how long the mechanical device takes to bring the weight to a stop the potential energy, of 53KW, would remain the same.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Be careful with terminology: "potential energy can be said to be 53 KW" makes no sense. You mean, the average power is 53 kW. Energy is measured in joules. Energy is conserved and power is not. If you take the same energy and spread it over a longer time, the power will decrease. So your last sentence is totally wrong.

Depending on how efficient the mechanism is, almost all of the 894289 joules can be recovered by the machine. Of course there's always some inefficiency, but there's no hard limit on efficiency like there is in a heat engine.
 
You are talking about a potential energy of 53 KW, energy is measured in Joules, not in Joules per second, which is W.
And if I understand your question correct, yes most of the energy gets converted into mechanical energy but there will also be a not neglible amount of heat after the collision.

Does that answer your question a little bit?
 
If a problem is stated in pounds and feet, please stick with those units when calculating potential energy in foot-pounds.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K