Question about KG with negative mass^2

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ChrisVer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Negative
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Klein-Gordon (KG) equation with negative mass squared, exploring its implications in classical field theory. Participants examine the nature of solutions and the potential instability of the field associated with negative mass squared values.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the KG equation with negative mass squared, suggesting that it leads to a modified form of the equation and questions whether the same solutions as in the standard KG equation apply.
  • Another participant asks for clarification on the context of the discussion, inquiring whether it pertains to quantum field theory, classical field theory, or a first-quantized relativistic wave equation.
  • A participant discusses the nature of solutions in the KG equation, noting that with negative mass squared, the energy and momentum become complex, leading to expectations of exponential solutions rather than oscillatory ones.
  • There is a reference to hyperbolic functions and their relationship to the solutions of the equation, indicating a potential misunderstanding or confusion regarding the expected forms of the solutions.
  • One participant raises a question about the implications of instability in the field, suggesting that exponential growth indicates instability, while expressing confusion about the meaning of displacement in the context of the field's state.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the implications of negative mass squared in the KG equation, with no consensus on the nature of the solutions or the interpretation of instability. Multiple viewpoints and questions remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about the context (classical vs. quantum field theory) and the definitions of terms like "instability" and "displacement" in relation to the field.

ChrisVer
Science Advisor
Messages
3,372
Reaction score
465
Well can someone review this?

KG equation:
\square \Phi + m^{2} \Phi =0, ~~ m^{2} <0 \Rightarrow m=i \mu
would lead to the form:
\square \Phi = \mu^{2} \Phi.

I'm trying to think if applying the same solution as in KG can also happen here...
Also for on-shell particles, I seem to be getting the "same" equation as we do for normal positive masses:
\int d^{4}k [k^{2}- \mu^{2}] \tilde{\Phi}(k) e^{ikx}=0
and so k^{2} = \mu^{2}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is your question??

And what is the context? QFT? Classical field theory? First-quantized relativistic wave equation?
 
My question is that in a normal KG equation, you have solutions:

e^{i (E t- \vec{k} \vec{x})}
Where E^{2} - k^{2} = m^{2}
and these are oscillating solutions... Now if I let m^2 <0 then it means that E,k \in C, is that right?
as such the solutions become exponentials...:/ however I was expecting hyperbolic solutions...

I think I'm talking about Classical FT...
 
##\cosh x = (e^x + e^{-x})/2##, ##\sinh x = (e^x - e^{-x})/2## ...
 
and how can someone deduce from that the instability of the field? because it explodes exponentially? although I am a bit confused about x in \phi(x) and what it actually means... eg some people say that it's unstable because if you make some displacement x--> x+dx then it won't remain in the same state...however \phi should exist in the whole space, no?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K