Equivalent Klein-Gordon Lagrangians and equations of motion

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the equivalence of different forms of the Klein-Gordon Lagrangian for a free scalar field and the implications for the Euler-Lagrange equations. Participants explore the derivation of these equations when the Lagrangian includes higher-order derivatives, focusing on the mathematical formulation and variations of the action.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the standard Klein-Gordon Lagrangian and derives an equivalent form, questioning the correct Euler-Lagrange equations for the latter.
  • Another participant notes that the Euler-Lagrange equation is valid only for Lagrangians with first-order derivatives, suggesting that additional partial integrations are necessary for higher-order derivatives.
  • A participant acknowledges the difference in Euler-Lagrange equations due to the presence of second-order derivatives in the alternative Lagrangian form.
  • Another participant proposes a derived form of the Euler-Lagrange equations for Lagrangians with second-order derivatives, seeking confirmation of its correctness.
  • Some participants agree that the resulting equations of motion will ultimately be the same if the additional terms for second-order derivatives are included, despite differences in the forms of the Lagrangians.
  • A participant inquires about the computation of the second-order variation of the action, expressing uncertainty about the correct form of the second-order term in the expansion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that while the Lagrangians are equivalent, their Euler-Lagrange equations differ due to the order of derivatives involved. There is no consensus on the exact form of the second-order variation of the action, as participants express uncertainty and seek clarification.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of deriving equations of motion from Lagrangians with higher-order derivatives and the need for careful treatment of variations in such cases. Specific assumptions about boundary conditions and the nature of variations are acknowledged but not fully resolved.

Frank Castle
Messages
579
Reaction score
23
Suppose one starts with the standard Klein-Gordon (KG) Lagrangian for a free scalar field: $$\mathcal{L}=\frac{1}{2}\partial_{\mu}\phi\partial^{\mu}\phi-\frac{1}{2}m^{2}\phi^{2}$$ Integrating by parts one can obtain an equivalent (i.e. gives the same equations of motion) Lagrangian $$\mathcal{L}=-\frac{1}{2}\phi\left(\Box +m^{2}\right)\phi$$ where ##\Box:=\partial_{\mu}\partial^{\mu}##.

My question is, what is the correct form for the Euler-Lagrange equations in this second case? Naively, I find that $$\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial\phi}-\partial_{\mu}\left(\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial(\partial_{\mu}\phi)}\right)=-m^{2}\phi-\frac{1}{2}\Box\phi +0=-m^{2}\phi-\frac{1}{2}\Box\phi=0$$ which clearly isn't correct. Should the Euler-Lagrange equation be modified to $$\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial\phi}-\Box\left(\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial(\Box\phi)}\right)=0\;?$$ such that $$\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial\phi}-\Box\left(\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial(\Box\phi)}\right)=-m^{2}\phi-\frac{1}{2}\Box\phi
-\frac{1}{2}\Box\phi=-(\Box+m^{2})\phi =0$$
Apologies for a potentially silly question, but I'm a bit stuck on this issue.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The EL equation you quote is only valid when the Lagrangian only contains first order derivatives. For the case when the Lagrangian contains higher order derivatives, you need to do additional partial integrations when deriving the corresponding equations of motion. I suggest going through the entire derivation of the EL equations in this case to see the difference.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Orodruin said:
The EL equation you quote is only valid when the Lagrangian only contains first order derivatives. For the case when the Lagrangian contains higher order derivatives, you need to do additional partial integrations when deriving the corresponding equations of motion. I suggest going through the entire derivation of the EL equations in this case to see the difference.

Ah ok. So even if they are equivalent Lagrangians, their Euler-Lagrange equations will be different because the former contains up to first-order derivatives whereas the latter contains up to second-order derivatives.

I've had a go at deriving the Euler-Lagrange equations for a Lagrangian containing up to second-order derivatives and the form I get is: $$\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial\phi}-\partial_{\mu}\left(\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial(\partial_{\mu}\phi)}\right)+\partial_{\mu}\partial_{\nu}\left(\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial(\partial_{\mu}\partial_{\nu}\phi)}\right)=0$$ assuming that ##\delta\phi=0=\delta(\partial_{\mu}\phi)## on the boundary of the spacetime volume.
Would this be correct?
 
Frank Castle said:
Ah ok. So even if they are equivalent Lagrangians, their Euler-Lagrange equations will be different because the former contains up to first-order derivatives whereas the latter contains up to second-order derivatives.

The resulting EL equations will be exactly the same if you include the additional terms that you need to include when there are second order derivatives in the Lagrangian. What terms in the EL equations that are non-zero will depend on which form of the Lagrangian you use - but the end result will be the same.

Frank Castle said:
I've had a go at deriving the Euler-Lagrange equations for a Lagrangian containing up to second-order derivatives and the form I get is: $$\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial\phi}-\partial_{\mu}\left(\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial(\partial_{\mu}\phi)}\right)+\partial_{\mu}\partial_{\nu}\left(\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial(\partial_{\mu}\partial_{\nu}\phi)}\right)=0$$ assuming that ##\delta\phi=0=\delta(\partial_{\mu}\phi)## on the boundary of the spacetime volume.
Would this be correct?

Yes. Note that this will give you exactly the same equation of motion in the end (the KG equation).
 
Orodruin said:
The resulting EL equations will be exactly the same if you include the additional terms that you need to include when there are second order derivatives in the Lagrangian. What terms in the EL equations that are non-zero will depend on which form of the Lagrangian you use - but the end result will be the same.
Yes. Note that this will give you exactly the same equation of motion in the end (the KG equation).

Ok cool, thanks.

How does one compute the second-order variation? Naively, if I expand the action around the stationary solution, ##\varphi## to second order, I have: $$S[\phi]=S[\varphi]+\int\,d^{4}x\frac{\delta S[\phi]}{\delta\phi(x)}\delta\phi(x)
+\int\,d^{4}xd^{4}y\frac{\delta^{2} S[\phi]}{\delta\phi(x)\delta\phi(y)}\delta\phi(x)\delta\phi(y)+\cdots$$ The first-order term is just ##\frac{\delta S[\phi]}{\delta\phi(x)}=\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial\phi}-\partial_{\mu}\left(\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial(\partial_{\mu}\phi)}\right)=(\Box +m^{2})\varphi=0##, however, what is the form of the second-order term? I assume that the second-order variation of the Lagrangian is $$\delta^{2}\mathcal{L}=\frac{\delta^{2}\mathcal{L}}{\delta\phi(x)\delta\phi(y)}\delta\phi(x)\delta\phi(y)+\frac{\delta^{2}\mathcal{L}}{\delta\phi(x)
\delta(\partial_{\mu}\phi(y))
}\delta\phi(x)\delta(\partial_{\mu}\phi(y))
+\frac{\delta^{2}\mathcal{L}}{
\delta(\partial_{\mu}\phi(x))
\delta(\partial_{\mu}\phi(y))
}
\delta(\partial_{\mu}\phi(x))
\delta(\partial_{\mu}\phi(y))$$ but I'm not sure.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K