Question about micro-positioning systems

  • Thread starter Thread starter ChaseRLewis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Systems
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges and considerations in creating a micro-positioning system using piezo actuators, particularly focusing on feedback control mechanisms for achieving precision in the sub-micrometer range. Participants explore various technologies and methods, including interferometry and displacement sensors, while addressing environmental factors that may affect accuracy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using an interferometer for feedback control but expresses uncertainty about mechanical implementation and temperature sensitivity.
  • Another participant proposes the idea of using holographic imaging to compare constant images with a reference sample, questioning if this method would provide the necessary resolution.
  • A different participant acknowledges the complexity of interferometry and suggests exploring various displacement sensor technologies, mentioning laser and capacitive displacement sensors as potential options.
  • Concerns are raised about the impact of temperature fluctuations and vibrations on measurement accuracy, with a suggestion to use a granite-composite base for vibration attenuation.
  • One participant mentions plans to use an air bearing stand for high precision and indicates a willingness to implement temperature control measures using Peltier devices.
  • There is a discussion about the feasibility of achieving sub-micrometer precision, with one participant noting that while a micrometer might be sufficient, they are curious about methods to improve precision further.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions on the best methods for feedback control and the challenges of achieving sub-micrometer precision. There is no consensus on a single approach, and multiple competing views remain regarding the technologies and environmental controls necessary for success.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to temperature sensitivity and the complexity of various measurement technologies, indicating that these factors could significantly influence the effectiveness of the proposed solutions.

ChaseRLewis
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
So I've recently came into a few dirt cheap piezo actuators. Was considering turning them into a x-y-z positioning stage then maybe a micromill or something. My one issue is I'm unsure of what is best to use for feedback control in the sub-micrometer range.

Only thing I know that accurate is an interferometer. I also wouldn't 100% know how to guarantee that through mechanical means as most other means are temperature sensitive. Any help?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I know nothing about this, and yet insist upon having an opinion. Your mention of an interferometer tweaked something in my brain. The first thing that popped into my mind, although I have no idea of how it can be done, is to take constant holographic images and compare them to a reference sample taken before any movement occurs. Would that have the required resolution?
 
Danger said:
I know nothing about this, and yet insist upon having an opinion. Your mention of an interferometer tweaked something in my brain. The first thing that popped into my mind, although I have no idea of how it can be done, is to take constant holographic images and compare them to a reference sample taken before any movement occurs. Would that have the required resolution?

That would be using interferometry : P I could but it's more i don't have a lot of experience with optics, I mean what type of optics would I need? Also image comparison is very computationally expensive and would need a camera on each axis for verification which would be fairly expensive. The accuracy of the motors at full step is below a micrometer but I've been reading about how 1 nm is pretty easy to get with closed-loop feedback ... but none mention what they use to get that closed loop feedback ...

Maybe some sort of peizo material that stretches? Not 100% sure on my options.
 
Okay then... and don't forget about that explanation that I don't know what I'm talking about...
Would you be able to get your mitts on something like an atomic force microscope?
 
Sub-micron range is tough to do. Even at single-digit micron range, you must operate in a controlled environment to minimize temperature-induced errors.

Interferometry has merit I think. I've never done it, but my perception of the complexity just scares the bejabbers out of me. I'd first look at some of the various displacement sensor technologies out there. I have experience with laser displacement sensors (Keyence, others), and capacitive displacement sensors (Keyence). Perhaps modern implementations of some ultra-high precision LVDTs may offer something useful. None of this stuff is cheap.

But again, temperature is your Devil. A couple degree's change in temperature will skew your values at that magnitude. Same thing could be said for induced vibrations. I'd hazard an opinion that you'd have to mount this affair on a granite-composite base structure for vibration attenuation.
 
tygerdawg said:
Sub-micron range is tough to do. Even at single-digit micron range, you must operate in a controlled environment to minimize temperature-induced errors.

Interferometry has merit I think. I've never done it, but my perception of the complexity just scares the bejabbers out of me. I'd first look at some of the various displacement sensor technologies out there. I have experience with laser displacement sensors (Keyence, others), and capacitive displacement sensors (Keyence). Perhaps modern implementations of some ultra-high precision LVDTs may offer something useful. None of this stuff is cheap.

But again, temperature is your Devil. A couple degree's change in temperature will skew your values at that magnitude. Same thing could be said for induced vibrations. I'd hazard an opinion that you'd have to mount this affair on a granite-composite base structure for vibration attenuation.

Ya I'm planning on doing an air bearing type stand for it. That's what they use for high precision optic tables.

Ya, I'll do temperature control when operating it. No real way around that, and building a box for temperature control would be cheap / easy. Just some cheap peltier devices with temperature feed back.

Micrometer is probably good enough, just was thinking of "how do i get more!".
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
9K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K