Question about radioactive sources

  • Thread starter Thread starter THEMuffinMan7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radioactive Sources
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of closed radioactive sources (Cs137, Pb210, Na22) for a project, focusing on the relationship between the activity of these sources and the emitted radiation, particularly beta and gamma radiation. Participants explore the detection efficiency of Geiger tubes and the challenges in measuring beta particle emissions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the activity of a radioactive source is related to the amount of substance or the actual radiation emitted, noting concerns about beta radiation being absorbed by the container.
  • Another participant explains that activity is related to the number of atoms and decay constant, mentioning that detection efficiency is influenced by geometry and distance factors.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about the ability to measure beta particles escaping from the source, highlighting the limited travel distance of beta particles in materials.
  • It is noted that beta detection depends on the source, detector, and intervening materials, with efficiency being a function of beta energy.
  • One participant suggests that the best method for counting beta activity would involve placing the source inside the detector, though this may not be practical.
  • A participant inquires about the relationship between decay rates and the number of beta and gamma decays per second, seeking clarification on the decay process of Cs137.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the relationship between activity and emitted radiation, as well as the challenges in measuring beta emissions. No consensus is reached on the best method for determining beta particle sensitivity or the specifics of decay rates.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in measuring beta emissions due to absorption and interaction with materials between the source and detector. There is also uncertainty regarding the practical implementation of suggested methods for counting beta and gamma activity.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in radiation detection, nuclear physics, and the practical applications of radioactive sources in experimental settings may find this discussion relevant.

THEMuffinMan7
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

I have a few closed radioactive sources (Cs137, Pb210, Na22) that I am trying to use for a project but I am not that knowledgeable about them.

Their activity is shown on the source but I'm unsure if this is related to the amount ie grams of substance inside the sealed container, or if it relates to how much radiation is actually being emitted from the sealed container. ie. internal absorption is accounted for. For beta radiation in particular I would think that a large portion would be re-absorbed by the plastic mold it is kept in.

I am trying to find the beta efficiency and gamma efficiency of some geiger tubes and am wondering if it is even possible with what I have??

Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The activity is related to the mass or number of atoms present, and the decay constant (half-life), and date from which the source was produced. Since the sources were produced, the activity will decrease in time.

Detection efficiency will include geometry and distance factors.

The beta and gamma radiation is emitted in all directions, so only some of the radiation will reach the detector (solid angle subtended by the detection chamber), and only some (most) will interact with the detector. Beta particles will be much more attenuated than gamma rays.

Ostensibly, one is using these sources at an institution licensed to possesses these sources.
 
Thanks for your reply,

So since it is solely based on the number of atoms present, it may not be adequate for my needs. The problem is, beta particles can only travel a few mm in most materials, (correct me if I'm wrong) therefore much of the emitted beta particles will not exit the closed source. Basically I have no way of knowing how many beta particles are leaving the disk source. I am trying to find (somewhat accurately) the sensitivity of these geiger tubes to beta particles. Is there another way to do this? Or is there a way to discover the actual amount of beta particles being emitted?

Also yes, I have borrowed these sources from my universities physics department. I am in engineering. Most of them are exempt, one beta source is around 4 micro curie.
 
Beta detection depends on the source and detector and what lies in between.

One is correct that betas will interact with atoms between the source and detector, so detection efficiency will be a function of beta energy as well as other factors.

For each nuclide, the information given is usually the most probable energy, which is roughly one-third of the maximum energy.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nuclear/beta.html#c5

One is using sealed source, and usually, the best way to count beta activity would be to place the source material inside the detector (2π, or hemsiphere). That may not be practical however. Otherwise, one must bring the window of the Geiger counter close to the beta source.

Does one have instructions on counting beta and gamma activity. Typically one would measure both, then place a shield between the source and detector to exclude betas and measure mostly gamma.
 
Thank you, I think I managed to collect the data necessary. I will report on my findings in a bit Quick question though.

Suppose you have Cs137 which decays at a rate of 2109 bq. Is it correct to say that from that you have 2109 Beta decays per second from the Cs137 and also 2109 gamma decays per second from the secondary decay?

Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K