Medical Question about reactions in biochemistry

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the Gibbs free energy change (ΔG°) and the equilibrium constant (K) in exergonic reactions. It emphasizes that a negative ΔG′° indicates that the equilibrium favors the product, leading to a higher concentration of product than substrate. The key point is that ΔG° and K are intrinsically linked; any factor that influences ΔG° will also affect K, as they convey the same information. The conversation argues against the notion that equilibrium can be influenced by ΔG° and "other factors" independently, asserting that either ΔG° solely determines K or both are influenced by external factors, but not in a mixed manner.
samy4408
Messages
62
Reaction score
9
we assume that we have an exergonic reaction , a substrate going to a product , is the negative ΔG′° the principal reason that the equilibrium favors the product (there is more product than substrate at equilibrium )?, or it is not and that depends on other factors? , thanks .
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Given the relation between ΔG° and equilibrium, ΔG° = -RT ln K, anything that affects ΔG° also affects K and vice versa. They both contain the same information. It makes no sense to talk about equilibrium being determined by ΔG° and "other factors". Either you can say that ΔG° fully determines K, with no other factors involved, or you can say that both ΔG° and K (which are just different ways of saying the same thing) are fully determined by the "other factors". You can't mix the explanations, in a way that suggests that there can be factors that affect K but not ΔG°, or vice versa.
 
mjc123 said:
Given the relation between ΔG° and equilibrium, ΔG° = -RT ln K, anything that affects ΔG° also affects K and vice versa. They both contain the same information. It makes no sense to talk about equilibrium being determined by ΔG° and "other factors". Either you can say that ΔG° fully determines K, with no other factors involved, or you can say that both ΔG° and K (which are just different ways of saying the same thing) are fully determined by the "other factors". You can't mix the explanations, in a way that suggests that there can be factors that affect K but not ΔG°, or vice versa.
thanks a lot !
 
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top