Medical Question about reactions in biochemistry

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the Gibbs free energy change (ΔG°) and the equilibrium constant (K) in exergonic reactions. It emphasizes that a negative ΔG′° indicates that the equilibrium favors the product, leading to a higher concentration of product than substrate. The key point is that ΔG° and K are intrinsically linked; any factor that influences ΔG° will also affect K, as they convey the same information. The conversation argues against the notion that equilibrium can be influenced by ΔG° and "other factors" independently, asserting that either ΔG° solely determines K or both are influenced by external factors, but not in a mixed manner.
samy4408
Messages
62
Reaction score
9
we assume that we have an exergonic reaction , a substrate going to a product , is the negative ΔG′° the principal reason that the equilibrium favors the product (there is more product than substrate at equilibrium )?, or it is not and that depends on other factors? , thanks .
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Given the relation between ΔG° and equilibrium, ΔG° = -RT ln K, anything that affects ΔG° also affects K and vice versa. They both contain the same information. It makes no sense to talk about equilibrium being determined by ΔG° and "other factors". Either you can say that ΔG° fully determines K, with no other factors involved, or you can say that both ΔG° and K (which are just different ways of saying the same thing) are fully determined by the "other factors". You can't mix the explanations, in a way that suggests that there can be factors that affect K but not ΔG°, or vice versa.
 
mjc123 said:
Given the relation between ΔG° and equilibrium, ΔG° = -RT ln K, anything that affects ΔG° also affects K and vice versa. They both contain the same information. It makes no sense to talk about equilibrium being determined by ΔG° and "other factors". Either you can say that ΔG° fully determines K, with no other factors involved, or you can say that both ΔG° and K (which are just different ways of saying the same thing) are fully determined by the "other factors". You can't mix the explanations, in a way that suggests that there can be factors that affect K but not ΔG°, or vice versa.
thanks a lot !
 
Popular article referring to the BA.2 variant: Popular article: (many words, little data) https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/17/health/ba-2-covid-severity/index.html Preprint article referring to the BA.2 variant: Preprint article: (At 52 pages, too many words!) https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.02.14.480335v1.full.pdf [edited 1hr. after posting: Added preprint Abstract] Cheers, Tom
Back
Top