Medical Question about reactions in biochemistry

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the Gibbs free energy change (ΔG°) and the equilibrium constant (K) in exergonic reactions. It emphasizes that a negative ΔG′° indicates that the equilibrium favors the product, leading to a higher concentration of product than substrate. The key point is that ΔG° and K are intrinsically linked; any factor that influences ΔG° will also affect K, as they convey the same information. The conversation argues against the notion that equilibrium can be influenced by ΔG° and "other factors" independently, asserting that either ΔG° solely determines K or both are influenced by external factors, but not in a mixed manner.
samy4408
Messages
62
Reaction score
9
we assume that we have an exergonic reaction , a substrate going to a product , is the negative ΔG′° the principal reason that the equilibrium favors the product (there is more product than substrate at equilibrium )?, or it is not and that depends on other factors? , thanks .
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Given the relation between ΔG° and equilibrium, ΔG° = -RT ln K, anything that affects ΔG° also affects K and vice versa. They both contain the same information. It makes no sense to talk about equilibrium being determined by ΔG° and "other factors". Either you can say that ΔG° fully determines K, with no other factors involved, or you can say that both ΔG° and K (which are just different ways of saying the same thing) are fully determined by the "other factors". You can't mix the explanations, in a way that suggests that there can be factors that affect K but not ΔG°, or vice versa.
 
mjc123 said:
Given the relation between ΔG° and equilibrium, ΔG° = -RT ln K, anything that affects ΔG° also affects K and vice versa. They both contain the same information. It makes no sense to talk about equilibrium being determined by ΔG° and "other factors". Either you can say that ΔG° fully determines K, with no other factors involved, or you can say that both ΔG° and K (which are just different ways of saying the same thing) are fully determined by the "other factors". You can't mix the explanations, in a way that suggests that there can be factors that affect K but not ΔG°, or vice versa.
thanks a lot !
 
Thread 'Magnetoreception in Animals'
For more than a hundred years people have been intrigued by how animals are able to do certain navigating tasks so well. Being able to sense magnetic fields has been one of several clues animals could use to figure out where they should go. Among possible magnetic sensory mechanisms have been: light sensitive proteins (cryptochromes) in the retina that can also react to magnetic fields. Microscopic magnetite crystals on found in various areas of the body (often the nose near nerves) A new...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
21K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K