Question about reactions in biochemistry

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between ΔG′° and equilibrium in exergonic reactions, specifically addressing whether the negative ΔG′° is the sole determinant of product favorability at equilibrium. It concludes that ΔG° and the equilibrium constant K are intrinsically linked through the equation ΔG° = -RT ln K, indicating that any changes to ΔG° will directly influence K and vice versa. The conversation emphasizes that one cannot attribute equilibrium to ΔG° while simultaneously considering other factors without creating confusion, as both concepts convey the same information.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamics in biochemistry
  • Familiarity with the concepts of ΔG° and equilibrium constants
  • Knowledge of the equation ΔG° = -RT ln K
  • Basic principles of exergonic reactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of ΔG° on biochemical reaction kinetics
  • Explore the role of temperature and pressure in affecting ΔG° and K
  • Investigate the concept of reaction coupling in metabolic pathways
  • Learn about enzyme kinetics and their relationship with ΔG°
USEFUL FOR

Biochemists, students of biochemistry, and researchers interested in thermodynamics and reaction dynamics in biochemical processes.

samy4408
Messages
62
Reaction score
9
we assume that we have an exergonic reaction , a substrate going to a product , is the negative ΔG′° the principal reason that the equilibrium favors the product (there is more product than substrate at equilibrium )?, or it is not and that depends on other factors? , thanks .
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Given the relation between ΔG° and equilibrium, ΔG° = -RT ln K, anything that affects ΔG° also affects K and vice versa. They both contain the same information. It makes no sense to talk about equilibrium being determined by ΔG° and "other factors". Either you can say that ΔG° fully determines K, with no other factors involved, or you can say that both ΔG° and K (which are just different ways of saying the same thing) are fully determined by the "other factors". You can't mix the explanations, in a way that suggests that there can be factors that affect K but not ΔG°, or vice versa.
 
mjc123 said:
Given the relation between ΔG° and equilibrium, ΔG° = -RT ln K, anything that affects ΔG° also affects K and vice versa. They both contain the same information. It makes no sense to talk about equilibrium being determined by ΔG° and "other factors". Either you can say that ΔG° fully determines K, with no other factors involved, or you can say that both ΔG° and K (which are just different ways of saying the same thing) are fully determined by the "other factors". You can't mix the explanations, in a way that suggests that there can be factors that affect K but not ΔG°, or vice versa.
thanks a lot !
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
21K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K