A Question about Stark interference

  • Thread starter Thread starter BillKet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interference
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on a question regarding the Stark interference experiment described in a referenced paper, specifically the use of molecular rotation quantum numbers at points A and F. The inquiry highlights a potential inconsistency in how an electric field in the z-direction could connect states with different magnetic quantum numbers, m_N. The mathematical analysis suggests that the integral involving spherical harmonics yields zero, indicating that the expected transition should not occur under the given conditions. However, it is noted that there may be a mixture of quantum numbers in either parity state that enables a weak, higher-order Stark effect. This implies that while the direct transition seems forbidden, subtle interactions could still facilitate the observed effects.
BillKet
Messages
311
Reaction score
30
Hello! I have a question about this paper (@Twigg ?). They claim towards the end of the second page that they use points A and F for their experiment. But for example, at point A the molecular rotation quantum numbers are ##|N=0,m_N=0>## and ##|N=1,m_N=1>##. However, in their experiment the electric field is in the z-direction, which is the direction of the magnetic field, too, which defines the ##m_N##. So if that is the case (and given that the dipole moment operator doesn't interact with the electron or nuclear spins), how can an electric field in the z direction connect 2 states of different ##m_N##? Am I missing something?

Based on my math we should have this:

$$<N=0,m_N=0|\vec{d}\cdot\vec{E}|N=1,m_N=1> = <N=0,m_N=0|d\hat{n}\cdot\vec{E}|N=1,m_N=1>$$
where E is the electric field and ##\hat{n}## is the internuclear axis direction (defined in the frame of the molecule). In general we have:

$$\hat{n} = \sin\theta\cos\phi \hat{x} + \sin\theta\sin\phi \hat{y} + \cos\theta\hat{z}$$
when expressing ##\hat{n}## in the lab frame. From here we get:

$$<N=0,m_N=0|\vec{d}\cdot\vec{E}|N=1,m_N=1> = E_z <N=0,m_N=0|\cos\theta|N=1,m_N=1> $$
We also have that:
$$\cos\theta \propto Y_1^0$$
where ##Y_1^0## is a spherical harmonic and:
$$|N,m_N> \propto Y_N^{m_N}$$
so the above term becomes:

$$<N=0,m_N=0|\vec{d}\cdot\vec{E}|N=1,m_N=1> = E_z \int(Y_0^0\times Y_1^0 \times Y_1^1)$$
where the integral is over ##\theta## and ##\phi##. But that integral is zero (which is a long way of saying that the signed sum of ##m_N## values appearing in the spherical harmonics of that integral is not zero).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry for the really slow reply!

Check out this paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/0708.2925
Specifically, the paragraph near the bottom of the left column on page 2 that starts "We calculate C...".

In short, there is some mixture of quantum numbers in either parity state that allows a weak, higher-order stark effect.

Hope that helps!
 
  • Like
Likes BillKet and DrClaude
A relative asked me about the following article: Experimental observation of a time rondeau crystal https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-025-03028-y I pointed my relative to following article: Scientists Discovered a Time Crystal That Reveals a New Way to Order Time https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/scientists-discovered-time-crystal-reveals-180055389.html This area is outside of my regular experience. I'm interested in radiation effects in polycrystalline material, i.e., grain...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
950
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K