A Question about Stark interference

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter BillKet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interference
BillKet
Messages
311
Reaction score
30
Hello! I have a question about this paper (@Twigg ?). They claim towards the end of the second page that they use points A and F for their experiment. But for example, at point A the molecular rotation quantum numbers are ##|N=0,m_N=0>## and ##|N=1,m_N=1>##. However, in their experiment the electric field is in the z-direction, which is the direction of the magnetic field, too, which defines the ##m_N##. So if that is the case (and given that the dipole moment operator doesn't interact with the electron or nuclear spins), how can an electric field in the z direction connect 2 states of different ##m_N##? Am I missing something?

Based on my math we should have this:

$$<N=0,m_N=0|\vec{d}\cdot\vec{E}|N=1,m_N=1> = <N=0,m_N=0|d\hat{n}\cdot\vec{E}|N=1,m_N=1>$$
where E is the electric field and ##\hat{n}## is the internuclear axis direction (defined in the frame of the molecule). In general we have:

$$\hat{n} = \sin\theta\cos\phi \hat{x} + \sin\theta\sin\phi \hat{y} + \cos\theta\hat{z}$$
when expressing ##\hat{n}## in the lab frame. From here we get:

$$<N=0,m_N=0|\vec{d}\cdot\vec{E}|N=1,m_N=1> = E_z <N=0,m_N=0|\cos\theta|N=1,m_N=1> $$
We also have that:
$$\cos\theta \propto Y_1^0$$
where ##Y_1^0## is a spherical harmonic and:
$$|N,m_N> \propto Y_N^{m_N}$$
so the above term becomes:

$$<N=0,m_N=0|\vec{d}\cdot\vec{E}|N=1,m_N=1> = E_z \int(Y_0^0\times Y_1^0 \times Y_1^1)$$
where the integral is over ##\theta## and ##\phi##. But that integral is zero (which is a long way of saying that the signed sum of ##m_N## values appearing in the spherical harmonics of that integral is not zero).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry for the really slow reply!

Check out this paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/0708.2925
Specifically, the paragraph near the bottom of the left column on page 2 that starts "We calculate C...".

In short, there is some mixture of quantum numbers in either parity state that allows a weak, higher-order stark effect.

Hope that helps!
 
  • Like
Likes BillKet and DrClaude
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Back
Top