Question about statement of Noether's theorem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Noether's theorem requires a differential transformation of coordinates that does not explicitly depend on time, as stated in Susskind's lecture on Classical Mechanics. The transformation is represented as \vec{q}\rightarrow \vec{q}'(\varepsilon,\vec{q}), where \varepsilon is a parameter. While the necessity of excluding time dependence may not be immediately clear, it is crucial for the theorem's application. The discussion also highlights that symmetries can exhibit explicit time dependence, particularly in cases involving Galilei and Lorentz boosts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Noether's theorem in theoretical physics
  • Familiarity with differential transformations in mechanics
  • Knowledge of Galilean and Lorentz transformations
  • Basic grasp of classical mechanics principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Noether's theorem in various physical systems
  • Explore differential transformations in depth
  • Investigate the role of time dependence in symmetry transformations
  • Review classical mechanics lectures by Leonard Susskind for further insights
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, students of classical mechanics, and anyone interested in the foundational principles of symmetries in physics.

dEdt
Messages
286
Reaction score
2
In a lecture on Classical Mechanics by Susskind, he says that for Noether's theorem to hold, we have to have a differential transformation of the coordinates which does not depend on time explicitly ie from [itex]\vec{q}\rightarrow \vec{q}'(\varepsilon,\vec{q})[/itex], where s is some parameter. I don't see why it's necessary that the transformation doesn't contain a time term -- as far as I can tell, his proof didn't require that assumption, but perhaps it crept in somewhere.

Here's a link to the lecture: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZDy_Dccv4s&feature=relmfu (start at around 31 min).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is only the most simple case. More generally there can be symmetries with explicit time dependence in the symmetry transformation. The most prominent example is invariance under Galilei (Newtonian physics) or Lorentz (special relativistic physics) boosts.

There has been another thread on this topic recently in this forum. Just search for it!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 175 ·
6
Replies
175
Views
28K