Question about tension with ropes that have mass

  • Thread starter Thread starter sona1177
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Tension
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the forces and tensions in a system of two 1.00 kg blocks connected by ropes, with each rope having a mass of 0.25 kg. The upward acceleration of the entire assembly is 3.00 m/s². The calculated force F is 32 N, with the tension at the top of rope 1 being 19.2 N, the tension at the bottom of rope 1 at 16 N, and the tension at the top of rope 2 at 3.2 N. The assumption made was that there is no tension at the bottom of rope 2, as it is not in contact with any object.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Second Law of Motion
  • Knowledge of tension in ropes and forces in equilibrium
  • Basic principles of mass and acceleration
  • Ability to perform calculations involving forces and tensions
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Newton's Second Law and its applications in dynamic systems
  • Study the concept of tension in multi-body systems
  • Explore the effects of mass on tension in ropes
  • Learn about static vs. dynamic equilibrium in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the mechanics of forces and tensions in systems involving mass and acceleration.

sona1177
Messages
171
Reaction score
1
Two 1.00 kg blocks are connected by a rope. A second rope hangs beneath the lower block. Both ropes have a mass of .25 kilograms. The entire assembly is accelerated upward at 3.00 m/s^2 by force F.

a) what is F
b) what is the tension at the top end of rope 1?
c) what is the tension at bottom end of rope 1?
d) what is the tension at top end of rope 2?

My answers:

a) F=32 N

b) Tension at top of rope 1=19.2 N

c) Tension at bottom of rope 1= 16 N

d) Tension at top of rope 2= 3.2 N

I made the assumption that there was no tension at the bottom of rope 2 because there are no contact forces there, nothing is touching the bottom of the rope, it's just hanging. Everything depends on this assumption. Can you please tell me if my answers are correct? Thank you kindly for all your help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks good.
 
Thank you kindly for all your help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K