Question About Text: Example 4.1 on Page 35-6

  • Thread starter Thread starter mpresic3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Example Text
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a user's experience with a newly purchased textbook, noting its less comprehensive nature compared to the older book by Adler, Bazin, and Schiffers, and its suitability for undergraduate students. The user seeks clarification on the notation in example 4.1, specifically the meaning of the down-arrow followed by the 1 in equations 4.6-a and b, which relates to matrix indexing. They express a preference for the older book's content but acknowledge the new book's relevance and instructional value. Additionally, they mention the challenges of accessing older texts in digital format and consider purchasing a physical copy. Overall, the conversation highlights the user's mixed feelings about the new textbook while seeking assistance on specific content.
mpresic3
Messages
451
Reaction score
337
I just purchased this text. It is less comprehensive than the book by Adler, Bazin, Schiffers, and is written at an (mostly) undergraduate level.
I have a problem with example 4.1 on page 35-6. What is meant by the down-arrow followed by the 1 in two equations 4.6-a, b? I am not sure this is the right place for this thread, but I thought I would post it here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Post the equations if you want a helpful reply.
 
  • Like
Likes malawi_glenn
It's just saying that in the matrix ##({T^i}_j)=(\partial \bar{x}^i/\partial x^j)## the index ##i## labels the rows.

BTW I like this textbook very much. It's using much of the material in the older book but it's less advanced, i.e., an introductory book at the undergrad rather the graduate level.
 
OK, now I get it.

I borrowed the older book from the library and I have been using it. The new book's approach is definitely similar to the older one. I was disappointed at the undergraduate level but, of course, it is more current than the older book. I also like Hartle for undergrad but this textbook treats the subject differently. It may be more instructive than Hartle's "physics first" approach. The problems seem well chosen, but I am still examining the book, and it has only been 5 days.

There is a pdf copy on the net of Adler, Bazin, ... but I detest reading textbooks on the computer. I even thought of printing myself a copy but I do not know if a bindery would bind it. Now with Amazon, it is better to buy an old copy.
 
Moderator's note: Spin-off from another thread due to topic change. In the second link referenced, there is a claim about a physical interpretation of frame field. Consider a family of observers whose worldlines fill a region of spacetime. Each of them carries a clock and a set of mutually orthogonal rulers. Each observer points in the (timelike) direction defined by its worldline's tangent at any given event along it. What about the rulers each of them carries ? My interpretation: each...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K