Question about the formal definition of conservative force

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical definition of conservative forces, specifically addressing inaccuracies in the Wikipedia article on the topic. The key point raised is that the Poincaré lemma, which is crucial for defining conservative forces, is only applicable in simply-connected regions of space. The potential vortex serves as a notable counterexample that illustrates this limitation. The discussion emphasizes the need for precise mathematical definitions in physics, particularly regarding force fields and their conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservative forces in physics
  • Familiarity with the Poincaré lemma
  • Knowledge of simply-connected regions in topology
  • Basic concepts of potential vortices
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Poincaré lemma and its implications in mathematical physics
  • Study the characteristics of simply-connected regions in topology
  • Explore the concept of potential vortices and their significance in fluid dynamics
  • Examine the mathematical definitions of force fields and their conditions
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and students studying advanced mechanics who seek a deeper understanding of conservative forces and their mathematical foundations.

physics user1
So, I was reading the mathematical description of a conservative force o wikipedia : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservative_force and at the line "Many forces (particularly those that depend on velocity) are not force fields. In these cases, the above three conditions are not mathematically equivalent".
Why these statements are not mathematically equivalent?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: physics user1

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K