B Question about the limits of integration in a change of variables

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around changing variables in the integral ##\int_0^r \sqrt{(r^2 - x^2)}dx## to find the area of the first quadrant of a circle. The user questions the correctness of their new limits of integration after substituting ##x = r\cos{\theta}##. It is confirmed that the limits are calculated correctly, as the integral's definition allows for reversing limits. Additionally, using a decreasing function in the substitution is acceptable, and an alternative substitution using sine might simplify the process. Overall, the approach to finding the area appears valid.
Chenkel
Messages
482
Reaction score
109
Hello everyone,

If I have an integral ##\int_0^r \sqrt{(r^2 - x^2)}dx## and I'm integrating across the first quadrant to get the area of the first quater of a circle.

And I change variables with ##x = r\cos{\theta}## and ##dx = -{r}\sin{\theta}{d\theta}##

And I form a new integral that's ##-\int_{\frac {\pi}{2}}^0 \sqrt{(r^2 - ({r\cos{\theta}})^2)}r\sin{\theta}{d\theta}##

Did I calculate the limits of integration correctly? Because when x is 0 the arc from the x axis to y axis is ##\frac {\pi}{2}## and when x is r the arc is 0.

I got positive ##{\frac {\pi} 4} r^2## for the first quadrant area (1 quarter of the circle using these equations) so I imagine my approach should be working but I wonder about the rigorourness of the change of limits of integration in my approach.

Let me know what you think!

Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes that's fine. Note that, by definition, ##\int_a^b = -\int_b^a##. You could have sorted out the limits that way. In general, using a decreasing function in your substitution is fine.

Note that you could have used sine instead of cosine. Which might have been slightly simpler.
 
PeroK said:
Yes that's fine. Note that, by definition, ##\int_a^b = -\int_b^a##. You could have sorted out the limits that way. In general, using a decreasing function in your substitution is fine.

Note that you could have used sine instead of cosine. Which might have been slightly simpler.
Thank you!
 
Thread 'Problem with calculating projections of curl using rotation of contour'
Hello! I tried to calculate projections of curl using rotation of coordinate system but I encountered with following problem. Given: ##rot_xA=\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial z}=0## ##rot_yA=\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial x}=1## ##rot_zA=\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial y}=0## I rotated ##yz##-plane of this coordinate system by an angle ##45## degrees about ##x##-axis and used rotation matrix to...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K