Question about the Nyquist sampling rate

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vagabond7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rate Sampling
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Nyquist sampling rate is defined by the inequality Fs > 2Fm, where Fs is the sampling frequency and Fm is the maximum frequency of the signal. This strict inequality is crucial because sampling exactly at twice the maximum frequency can lead to reconstruction issues, such as aliasing. In practice, it is advisable to sample at a frequency significantly higher than the Nyquist rate to ensure accurate signal reconstruction. Additionally, the terms 'Nyquist frequency' and 'Nyquist rate' should not be used interchangeably, as they have distinct meanings in different contexts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic signal processing concepts
  • Familiarity with Shannon's sampling theorem
  • Knowledge of aliasing and its effects on signal reconstruction
  • Basic mathematical skills for interpreting inequalities
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of aliasing in signal processing
  • Explore advanced topics in Shannon's sampling theorem
  • Learn about practical applications of the Nyquist rate in digital audio processing
  • Investigate methods for mitigating aliasing in sampled signals
USEFUL FOR

Signal processing engineers, audio engineers, and anyone involved in digital signal analysis and reconstruction will benefit from this discussion.

Vagabond7
Messages
50
Reaction score
11
I'm trying to look up sources on the nyquist sampling rate, but I keep finding this small subtle difference between sources, and I am not sure if it is laziness or some subtle point I am missing.

Sometimes I see the nyquist rate as Fs>2Fm and sometimes I see it as Fs>=2Fm. So is it the sampling rate is any frequency equal or greater than two times the max frequency, or does the sampling frequency have to be greater than two times the signal's max frequency? Or is there some subtlety that I am missing in the articles I am reading, and under some circumstances it is equal to or greater and others it has to be greater.

I feel like I am finding online sources that write it one way and some write it the other way, and I just want to make sure my understanding is exact. Thanks in advance.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It's a strict inequality, since, if you take the classic example of a sine wave sampled at exactly twice its frequency, you could have the two samples per period lie on the zero crossings, and you can't reconstruct the original signal from a sequence of zeros. In practice, however, you'd typically sample at a much higher frequency than dictated by this inequality.

You can get away with sampling below the Nyquist rate for a signal, by exploiting aliasing, if it has both a lower and upper frequency bound for its content (sometimes called a passband signal).

As a sidenote: Be careful about using 'Nyquist frequency' and 'Nyquist rate' interchangeably. There can be a difference depending on context.
 
Thank you very much for the information, that clears everything up.
 
Shannon's sampling theorem says sample at twice the highest frequency present in the signal.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquist–Shannon_sampling_theorem
Wikipedia said:
If a function x(t) contains no frequencies higher than B cps, it is completely determined by giving its ordinates at a series of points spaced 1/(2B) seconds apart.
A sufficient sample-rate is therefore 2B samples/second, or anything larger. Conversely, for a given sample rate fs the bandlimit for perfect reconstruction is B ≤ fs/2 . When the bandlimit is too high (or there is no bandlimit), the reconstruction exhibits imperfections known as aliasing. Modern statements of the theorem are sometimes careful to explicitly state that x(t) must contain no sinusoidal component at exactly frequency B, or that B must be strictly less than ½ the sample rate. The two thresholds, 2B and fs/2 are respectively called the Nyquist rate and Nyquist frequency.

Nyquist had little to do with it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquist–Shannon_sampling_theorem#Why_Nyquist.3F
 
Baluncore said:
Shannon's sampling theorem says sample at twice the highest frequency present in the signal.
Wikipedia said:
Modern statements of the theorem are sometimes careful to explicitly state that x(t) must contain no sinusoidal component at exactly frequency B, or that B must be strictly less than ½ the sample rate.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K