Question about the photoelectric effect

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the efficiency of photodiodes in relation to the photoelectric effect, specifically questioning why photodiodes are not 100% efficient. It highlights that not all photons can cause electron emission, particularly if their wavelength is insufficient or if they miss electrons entirely. The work function of a metal may vary depending on the electron's position within the material. Additionally, photons can be absorbed by the lattice instead of causing emission, dissipating energy as heat. Understanding quantum efficiency is crucial to grasping these concepts fully.
Dima Petrukhin
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
1. The question asks why the photodiode is less than 100% efficient.2. hf=work function+KEmax


3.- I reckon this is as some light will not cause e to be emitted if the wavelength of the light is less the needed.
-Or some photons will not hit any electron.

Is this correct?
Thinking about this question got me wondering if the work function may vary in a metal depending on how 'deep' the electron is in the metal?

And is it possible for a single photon to go through the metal without hitting an electron and not causing emission?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I should say how close the electrons are to +ve metal ions
 
You say "photodiode" but you are describing the photoelectric effect. In a photodiode incoming photons create electron-hole pairs which are then detected as a current. This is not described by the equation hf=work function+KEmax.
Dima Petrukhin said:
And is it possible for a single photon to go through the metal without hitting an electron and not causing emission?
A single photon that does not cause emission does not have to go "through" the material. The photon's energy may be absorbed by the lattice and be dissipated as heat. Read about quantum efficiency here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_efficiency.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K