Question about the Work-Kinetic Energy Theorem - Pulling a cart

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the Work-Kinetic Energy Theorem to a physics problem involving a cart and a pulley system. The tension in the cord is a constant 25.0 N, and the cart moves from x1 = 3.00 m to x2 = 1.00 m, with a height of h = 1.20 m. Two integration approaches were evaluated: the first yielded an incorrect setup leading to a result of 34.77 J, while the second, correctly applying the force and angle relationships, provided a more accurate result of approximately 41.73 J. The correct integral setup is crucial for accurate calculations in physics problems involving forces and angles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Work-Kinetic Energy Theorem
  • Familiarity with integration techniques in physics
  • Knowledge of trigonometric relationships in right triangles
  • Ability to manipulate and evaluate definite integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Work-Kinetic Energy Theorem in detail
  • Learn advanced integration techniques, particularly for physics applications
  • Explore the relationship between forces and angles in pulley systems
  • Practice solving similar problems using different methods of integration
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as anyone looking to deepen their understanding of work, energy, and integration in physical systems.

titansarus
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Question from Fundamentals of Physics (Halliday, Resnick, Walker)
This figure below shows a cord attached to a cart that can slide along a frictionless horizontal rail aligned along an x axis. The left end of the cord is pulled over a pulley, of negligible mass and friction and at cord height ##h = 1.20 m##, so the cart slides from ##x1 = 3.00## m to ##x2 = 1.00 m##. During the move, the tension in the cord is a constant ##25.0 N##.What is the change in the kinetic energy of the cart during
physics question 3.png


Homework Equations



##\int dw = \int F . dr##

The Attempt at a Solution



At first we get that ##x/1.2 = cot \theta## so ##dx = -1.2 (1 + cot ^ 2 \theta) d\theta ##

Now I don't know whether to integrate the FIRST Or SECOND: (angles from ##x_1=3## to ##x_2=1## change from##\theta_1 = 0.380506377## to ##\theta_2 = 0.87605805059## radian)

FIRST: ##W= \int dw = \int _3^1 25 . dx = \int _{0.380}^{0.876} 25 * 1.2 (1 + cot ^ 2 \theta) d\theta = 41.67 J##

or using $$F = 25 cos \theta$$ and
SECOND: ##W= \int dw = \int _3^1 25 cos\theta . dx = \int _{0.380}^{0.876} 25 * cos \theta * 1.2 (1 + cot ^ 2 \theta) d\theta = 34.77 J##

The book itself solved it with another solution using pythagoras theorem and got the first answer but I want to solve it using angles and don't know why the first one gives the answer of the book. I think second one makes more sense.
 

Attachments

  • physics question 3.png
    physics question 3.png
    9.1 KB · Views: 882
Physics news on Phys.org
The setup for the first integral is incorrect. The correct expression is ##dW=\vec{F}\cdot d\vec{s}=F~\cos \theta ~dx##.
The setup for the second integral is correct for the reason above.
Having said that, note that ##dx=-h \csc^2 (\theta)d\theta=-h\frac{d\theta}{\sin^2(\theta)}##. It makes the integral calculation easier.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: titansarus and Delta2
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: titansarus
kuruman said:
The setup for the first integral is incorrect. The correct expression is ##dW=\vec{F}\cdot d\vec{s}=F~\cos \theta ~dx##.
The setup for the second integral is correct for the reason above.
Having said that, note that ##dx=-h \csc^2 (\theta)d\theta=-h\frac{d\theta}{\sin^2(\theta)}##. It makes the integral calculation easier.

Delta² said:
You have some calculation errors in both cases and also the first integral formula is wrong. The second integral is the correct one, and its correct evaluation is 41.7262 according to wolfram
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=integral+25*1.2*cosx*(1+cot^2x)dx+from+0.380506377+to+0.87605805059

EDIT: I used x entering the integral expression at wolfram but I meant ##\theta##, its the same thing for wolfram purposes.

Yes It seems my answer got wrong because I forgot to multiply 34.77 by 1.2 in calculations. And because the answer of the first one get numerically close to the book answer and the actual answer of the book was approximately 42, I thought the second one is Incorrect.

Thanks.
 
titansarus said:
Yes It seems my answer got wrong because I forgot to multiply 34.77 by 1.2 in calculations. And because the answer of the first one get numerically close to the book answer and the actual answer of the book was approximately 42, I thought the second one is Incorrect.
You could have saved yourself some trouble if you postponed the numerical substitution until the very end. It's a good habit. There is no need to find any angles. See solution below
$$W=\int_{x_2}^{x_1}F \cos \theta~dx=-Fh\int_{\theta_2}^{\theta_1} \cos \theta~\frac{d\theta}{\sin^2\theta}$$Let ##u=\sin \theta##. Then ##\cos \theta~d\theta=du##. So$$W=-Fh\int_{u_2}^{u_1} \frac{du}{u^2}=+Fh \left(\frac{1}{u_1}-\frac{1}{u_2}\right)=Fh \left(\frac{1}{\sin \theta_1}-\frac{1}{\sin \theta_2}\right).$$From the diagram, ##\sin \theta_i=\frac{opp}{hyp}=\frac{h}{\sqrt{x_i^2+h^2}}##. Substitute in the equation above to get,$$W=F \left(\sqrt{x_1^2+h^2}-\sqrt{x_2^2+h^2}\right)=25(N)\times \left(\sqrt{3^2+1.2^2}(m)-\sqrt{1^2+1.2^2}(m)\right)=41.73~J$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: titansarus

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
4K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K