Why do clocks experience time dilation in special and general relativity?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of time dilation as described in special and general relativity, particularly focusing on the mechanical aspects of clocks and how they behave under different conditions such as high speeds and gravitational fields. Participants explore both theoretical and practical implications of time dilation, including its representation in popular media.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about how physical clocks, which started at the same time, can show different times after one experiences high speeds or strong gravitational fields, questioning the literal change in the clock's hands.
  • Another participant argues that clocks do not slow down but take different paths through spacetime, using an analogy of cars traveling different routes at the same speed to illustrate this point.
  • A third participant emphasizes that from the perspective of a moving clock, nothing changes in its operation; the differences in time measurement arise from the relative motion between observers.
  • Some participants reference the movie "Interstellar" to question whether the portrayal of time dilation is accurate or metaphorical, particularly regarding the significant time difference experienced by a character after traveling near a black hole.
  • One participant introduces the concept of differential aging, distinguishing it from time dilation, and suggests that the portrayal in media may conflate these ideas.
  • Another participant mentions the influence of electric and magnetic fields on charged particles, hinting at a potential connection to the discussion but acknowledges uncertainty about its relevance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the mechanical implications of time dilation for physical clocks. There are competing views on whether clocks physically change or merely record time differently based on their paths through spacetime. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the interpretation of time dilation as depicted in popular media.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of relativity, noting that all motion is relative and that time is not absolute. There are also references to misconceptions about time dilation and the need for a deeper understanding of relativity to grasp these concepts fully.

  • #31
NoTe said:
I agree: It would be nice if there were a theory from which it followed that c be absolute, instead of a theory that took this as a starting point...
I don't know if you saw @PAllen 's post one minute before yours. He refers to this paper https://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0302045.pdf. It makes some very natural and intuitive assumptions (although the following math may not be so intuitive) and shows that there are only two mathematical possibilities: 1) old Galilean relativity and 2) Einsteinian relativity for some constant maximum velocity, a. When experiments showed that the speed of light was constant, it followed that Einsteinian relativity with a = c was correct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Janus said:
Let's take this example and tweak it a bit to bring it more in line with Relativity. Instead of both cars traveling in the same direction at different speeds, you have two cars traveling at the same speed but is slightly different directions. They both start off from the same point at 100 kph. But in different directions from each other. As each car travels along, it checks its progress against that of the other car, but each car judges this progress as being measured in the direction it itself is driving.
If we label the cars as A and B,this is how things look from A's perspective:
View attachment 217916
A makes faster progress in the direction that it s driving than B is making in that same direction.
B sees things like this:
View attachment 217917
B sees itself as making more progress than A in the direction that B is traveling.
This is the equivalent of time dilation due to relative motion in Special Relativity. In SR, the two clocks moving relative to each other measure each other as making less "progress through time" than they are, or in other words, aging slower.

Now consider what happens if B, after having traveled for some distance, alters its direction of travel, but not its speed, so that it is heading back towards the path of A.
This is what happens according to A
View attachment 217918
B ends up "behind" A. Even if A turns to travel in the same direction as A from this point on, it will always be behind A. With SR, this is the equivalent of a clock traveling away a some high speed and then returning at that speed and showing less time upon returning than the clock that "stayed home". In A's view this happens because B made slower progress during the entire trip.
B sees things a bit differently. Up until it makes it turn, A is "behind" it. But once it turns, A goes from behind to "in front". In the following animation this is shown by having the direction in which B is traveling at an given time as being in the vertical direction. After the turn, A goes from being below B to being above it. After that A still make slower progress than B in the vertical direction, but B never makes up all the distance before it reaches A's path. Again if after this point B turns to follow A it finds itself behind A.
View attachment 217920
This illustrate the difference that was alluded to in an earlier post between "time dilation" and "accumulated time difference". Time dilation is the difference in the rate of progress B measures for A at any given point of the trip, which during the two legs has B measuring A's clock as running slower. Accumulated time difference is the what we see at the end of the trip and is the result of the accumulation of the the time dilation during the legs, plus the "jump forward" that A appears to make as seen by B when B makes its turn.
In the animation this looks like a instantaneous jump. in reality it would take some none zero time. If we zoom in on A and B and slow down the turn, this what it would look like to B
View attachment 217915
The difference between the Car example and Relativity between clocks, is that with the car example, we are dealing with differences in direction that only involve two spatial dimensions. Relativity deals with space-time, and involve "direction changes" in both the spatial and time dimensions. The cars travel on different paths along in a two dimensional plane, while with SR, clocks traveling at different speeds take different paths through 4 dimensional space-time.

Directly visualizing this 4 dimensional movement is a bit hard to say the least, which is why most people initially struggle with understanding what "causes" one clock to tick off less time than another.

That was beautifully explained! Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
5K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 88 ·
3
Replies
88
Views
7K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K