Question concerning 2nd order homogeneous linear diff eqs

kostoglotov
Messages
231
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement



Regarding the case where the auxillary (characteristic) equation has complex roots, we solve the quadratic in the usual way using [itex]i[/itex] to get the general solution

[tex]y(x) = e^{\alpha x}\left(C_1 \cos{\beta x} + i C_2 \sin{\beta x}\right)[/tex]

And the textbook shows

[tex]y(x) = e^{\alpha x}\left(C_1 \cos{\beta x} + C_2 \sin{\beta x}\right)[/tex]

without the imaginary number [itex]i[/itex] in the equation.

At first I just assumed that the [itex]i[/itex] has been subsumed into the constant [itex]C_2[/itex], but then what is happening when we solve an initial value problem of this form, and find that [itex]C_2[/itex] is actually a real number? Where has the [itex]i[/itex] gone?
 
on Phys.org
If the initial conditions were such that ##C_2## was real in the first solution, then if we had used the 2nd solution, the initial condition would imply that ##C_2'## was imaginary. The important fact is that sin and cos are linearly independent solutions, so we can use any linear combination of them.
 
kostoglotov said:

Homework Statement



Regarding the case where the auxillary (characteristic) equation has complex roots, we solve the quadratic in the usual way using [itex]i[/itex] to get the general solution

[tex]y(x) = e^{\alpha x}\left(C_1 \cos{\beta x} + i C_2 \sin{\beta x}\right)[/tex]

And the textbook shows

[tex]y(x) = e^{\alpha x}\left(C_1 \cos{\beta x} + C_2 \sin{\beta x}\right)[/tex]

without the imaginary number [itex]i[/itex] in the equation.

At first I just assumed that the [itex]i[/itex] has been subsumed into the constant [itex]C_2[/itex], but then what is happening when we solve an initial value problem of this form, and find that [itex]C_2[/itex] is actually a real number? Where has the [itex]i[/itex] gone?
This link provides as clear an explanation as any:

http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/DE/ComplexRoots.aspx
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kostoglotov
kostoglotov said:

Homework Statement



Regarding the case where the auxillary (characteristic) equation has complex roots, we solve the quadratic in the usual way using [itex]i[/itex] to get the general solution

[tex]y(x) = e^{\alpha x}\left(C_1 \cos{\beta x} + i C_2 \sin{\beta x}\right)[/tex]

And the textbook shows

[tex]y(x) = e^{\alpha x}\left(C_1 \cos{\beta x} + C_2 \sin{\beta x}\right)[/tex]

without the imaginary number [itex]i[/itex] in the equation.

At first I just assumed that the [itex]i[/itex] has been subsumed into the constant [itex]C_2[/itex], but then what is happening when we solve an initial value problem of this form, and find that [itex]C_2[/itex] is actually a real number? Where has the [itex]i[/itex] gone?

From
[tex]y(x) = e^{\alpha x}\left(C_1 \cos{\beta x} + i C_2 \sin{\beta x}\right)[/tex]
we can write
[tex]y(x) = e^{\alpha x}\left(A_1 \cos{\beta x} + A_2 \sin{\beta x}\right).[/tex]
where ##A_1 = C_1## and ##A_2 = i C_2##. It is just notation, nothing more.

If ##y(x) = e^{\alpha x}\left(C_1 \cos{\beta x} + i C_2 \sin{\beta x}\right) ## and ##y(0), y'(0)## are given (for example), then we need
[tex]C_1 = y(0) \\<br /> \alpha C_1 + \beta i C_2 = y'(0)[/tex]
so
[tex]C_1 = y(0), \; C_2 = \frac{i}{\beta} \left( \alpha y(0) - y'(0) \right)[/tex]
If course, ##iC_2 = (y'(0) - \alpha y(0))/\beta## is real if ##y(0), y'(0)## are real.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kostoglotov

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K