Question dealing with the conservation of mechanical energy.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the conservation of mechanical energy in a physics problem involving a skateboarder moving up a ramp. The skateboarder starts with a speed of 5.4 m/s and ascends a ramp inclined at 48°, reaching a height of 0.40 m. The kinetic energy (KE) and potential energy (PE) equations are applied to determine the skateboarder's launch velocity at the end of the ramp, calculated to be approximately 4.617 m/s. The vertical component of this velocity is then used to find the maximum height achieved during projectile motion, resulting in a height of 0.6 m above the ramp.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinetic energy (KE) and potential energy (PE) concepts
  • Familiarity with projectile motion principles
  • Ability to apply conservation of energy equations
  • Knowledge of kinematic equations for vertical motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the conservation of energy equation in mechanics
  • Learn how to resolve velocities into horizontal and vertical components
  • Explore kinematic equations for projectile motion analysis
  • Investigate the effects of different angles of incline on projectile height
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts of energy conservation and projectile motion.

scroobnab
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The drawing shows a skateboarder moving at 5.4 m/s along a horizontal section of a track that is slanted upward by 48° above the horizontal at its end, which is 0.40 m above the ground. When she leaves the track, she follows the characteristic path of projectile motion. Ignoring friction and air resistance, find the maximum height H to which she rises above the end of the track.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I felt like my attempt was going well, but i can't seem to get the right answer. So i started out by realizing that Ef=Eo (i think), so KEf+PEf=KEo+PEo. I am just confused as to how i should go about calculating thee final speed, which i think i need to be able to complete the equations for H.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
also, sorry i don't have the picture attached, I am new to the site and not even sure how to do that..
 
Can you put a number to the launch velocity (the skateboarder's speed as she leaves the end of the ramp)?
 
gneill said:
Can you put a number to the launch velocity (the skateboarder's speed as she leaves the end of the ramp)?
Thats one of my main questions... would that value be 5.4/cos48? so 8.07 m/s?

So with that in mind, when dealing with a problem involving KE, does the orientation of the velocity matter?
 
scroobnab said:
Thats one of my main questions... would that value be 5.4/cos48? so 8.07 m/s?

So with that in mind, when dealing with a problem involving KE, does the orientation of the velocity matter?

The orientation will become important in the next step. First you need to be able to find the correct launch velocity. This is determined by the kinetic energy that the skateboarder has when she reaches the top of the ramp. She begins on the horizontal with a given velocity, then rises up the ramp. While she goes up, she will be trading some kinetic energy for potential energy (due to gravity). Can you write a conservation of energy expression for this process?
 
gneill said:
Can you write a conservation of energy expression for this process?
so would the velocity at the end be:

1/2(m)(Vo)^2 + mgho = 1/2(m)(Vf)^2 + mghf

cancelling the m's, and isolating for Vf:

Vf = (2 (1/2(Vo)^2 - ghf))^1/2

if so, i calculated vf (at the end of the ramp) to be 5.02 m/s
 
You've got the right idea, but I think your algebra may have a bit of a problem.

1/2(m)(Vo)2 + mgho = 1/2(m)(Vf)2 + mghf

Cancel the m's and multiply through by 2, and take ho = 0,

vo2 = vf2 + 2ghf

vf2 = vo2 - 2ghf

vf = sqrt(vo2 - 2ghf)

Plugging in your given values:

vf = 4.617 m/s (Keep an extra decimal place for intermediate results)
 
Last edited:
gneill said:
You've got the right idea, but I think your algebra may have a bit of a problem.
Oh okay, yeah stupid mistake. Alright now I'm getting a value of 4.6 m/s. So now I'm supposed to move on to the next section of her jump using this as the initial velocity?
 
scroobnab said:
Oh okay, yeah stupid mistake. Alright now I'm getting a value of 4.6 m/s. So now I'm supposed to move on to the next section of her jump using this as the initial velocity?

Right. Make a habit of hanging onto an extra decimal place or two for intermediate results in order to avoid rounding errors biting you in the end. Round results (answers) to the required precision.

So, the skateboarder leaves the ramp at the velocity that you've calculated, at the angle given for the ramp. This velocity can be broken into horizontal and vertical components, which can be treated independently. If you calculate the vertical component of the velocity, you should be able to use the appropriate equation of motion to determine the maximum height that she will reach.
 
  • #10
okay bear with me here lol. so with that value i can use kinematics to solve for the rest right?

Vo = 4.617 m/s
ay = -9.8 m/s
Vf = 0 m/s
then solve for y?
 
  • #11
scroobnab said:
okay bear with me here lol. so with that value i can use kinematics to solve for the rest right?

Vo = 4.617 m/s
ay = -9.8 m/s
Vf = 0 m/s
then solve for y?

Yes, that's the idea. Keep in mind that the Vo value is the composite speed; you need to break it down into its horizontal and vertical components, and use the vertical component to determine the maximum height.
 
  • #12
gneill said:
Yes, that's the idea. Keep in mind that the Vo value is the composite speed; you need to break it down into its horizontal and vertical components, and use the vertical component to determine the maximum height.

Alright, i did this and got a value of 3.43 for Voy. after plugging the values into the equation my value for y was 0.6 m.

Thank you SO much for your help, this has been really helpful and has cleared up a lot of questions i had about Kinetic Energy and such. Cheers!
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
12K