Question: How do I prove the current division law for two resistors in parallel?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the current division law for two resistors in parallel, specifically focusing on the relationship between the source current and the branch currents through the resistors. Participants are exploring the implications of the voltage across parallel resistors being equal and the sum of the branch currents equating to the total current.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to manipulate the equation I_s = I_1 + I_2 to derive the expression for I_1. There is discussion about using Ohm's law (I = V/R) and expressing the source current in terms of the voltages and resistances. Some participants express frustration at not seeing a critical relationship in their manipulations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various approaches being suggested. Some participants are attempting to eliminate variables and express relationships in terms of known quantities. There is no explicit consensus yet, but several productive lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note a lack of experience with proofs, which may be impacting their confidence and approach. There is also mention of needing to find equivalent resistance for the circuit, indicating a potential area of focus for further exploration.

RadiationX
Messages
255
Reaction score
0
My professor gave us the task of proving the current division law for two resistors in parallel. I know that the voltage across parallel resistors is the same, and that the sum of the branch currents adds to the sum of the total current.

Here is the question:

Prove that [tex]I_1= \frac{I_sR_2}{R_1 + R_2}[/tex] ; [tex]I_s[/tex] = the source current.

Now, this is what I know: [tex]I_s= I_1 +I_2[/tex]

That is about as far as I can get. I know that I need to manipulate [tex]I_s= I_1 +I_2[/tex] somehow to derive [tex]I_1= \frac{I_sR_2}{R_1 + R_2}[/tex].

This is the first time I have ever been assigned a proof and I don't have any experience solving them, so my tool set is kind of lacking.

As a side note I would like to be able to prove 'simple' theorems like this. I think it would give me a level of insight that I don't currently have.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I = V/R, correct? Please show us more work. Relax and focus.
 
yes I = V/R so...

[tex]I_s= \frac{V_s}{R_1} +\frac{V_s}{R_2}[/tex]

It appears that the thing to do here is get rid of the fractions. I have done this on paper, but I am not seeing a critical relationship when I work through it.
 
Last edited:
RadiationX said:
yes I = V/R so...

[tex]I_s= \frac{V_s}{R_1} +\frac{V_s}{R_2}[/tex]

It appears that the thing to do here is get rid of the fractions. I have done this on paper, but I am not seeing a critical relationship when I work through it.

Good. So write the equation for each leg...
 
The equation for each leg? Well, each leg is just back to the current again. Right? [tex]\frac{V_S}{R_1} + \frac{V_S}{R_2} = I_1 + I_2[/tex].

I'm running in circles!:cry:
 
Try to work out an expression for Vs in terms of the total resistance of the circuit and Is (so find the equivalent resistance of two resistors in parallel).
 
You can eliminate [itex]I_2[/itex] from the equation [itex]I_s=I_1+I_2[/itex], if you use the V=RI law to express [itex]I_2[/itex] as a function of [itex]I_1[/itex].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K