I Question of accuracy of galactic collision simulations

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Halc
  • Start date Start date
Halc
Gold Member
Messages
454
Reaction score
373
TL;DR Summary
Galaxy collisions seem to involve considerable friction which seems absent in simulations.
There are countless time lapse simulations of galactic collisions, squashing say 20 billion years into a few minutes or even seconds. Many of these involve the upcoming collision with Andromeda, but my question is more general.
No, I don't have a specific video in mind.

Most of these show a pair of fairly neat spiral galaxies with defined arms. The near arms distort first and the symmetry is lost. The cores of the galaxies represent considerable mass and their close pass causes at one point a sort of explosion of stars being flung away by gravitational acceleration (which robs especially the central black holes of much momentum). This part is fine and expected. Most of that material was already close to one of the central masses. Point is, those simulated flung objects tend to exit the maelstrom at speed without slowing, and I question this.

Compare this to observations of some recent galactic collisions. You have this disorganized mess shortly after what is concluded was a fairly high speed collision. What stands out with some of these is that each carried a cloud of dark matter which for the most part kept going and exited the combined galaxy whose rotation curve is now far lower than it would be with the DM. The baryonic matter coming in at those speeds all managed to slow down by interaction with matter from the other galaxy, when the dark matter did not. That demonstrates significant friction preventing these galaxies from just parting again like the dark matter did. Sure, some stuff was flung away, but if there was that much friction and it came from the combined core, it probably lost much of its speed to friction on the way out, dropping much of it back below escape velocity. The simulation don't seem to account for this.
I know they can't separately compute the effect between each planet, star, rock, dust, whatever, but to ignore average friction seems to be an oversight, and it would significantly alter the videos created. I'm not sure if there's a way to measure the actual baryonic mass ejected at escape velocity from a collision and compare it to the simulation.


Irrelevant to the question:
I presume the dark matter will eventually find its way back, but will always have this larger 'orbit' which prevents it from clustering significantly around the new galaxy. Its cloud will remain more dispersed that ones from lower speed collisions. I don't thing Andromeda is considered to be particularly high speed. In peculiar velocity terms, we're actually moving away from it and it is overtaking us from behind.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Halc said:
No, I don't have a specific video in mind.
Which, of course, will limit the usefulness of the discussion.
Halc said:
What stands out with some of these is that each carried a cloud of dark matter which for the most part kept going and exited the combined galaxy whose rotation curve is now far lower than it would be with the DM. The baryonic matter coming in at those speeds all managed to slow down by interaction with matter from the other galaxy, when the dark matter did not. That demonstrates significant friction preventing these galaxies from just parting again like the dark matter did. Sure, some stuff was flung away, but if there was that much friction and it came from the combined core, it probably lost much of its speed to friction on the way out, dropping much of it back below escape velocity.
I think you are over-stating how much friction is involved. Wherever these is substantial and immediate friction, there will be enormous heat. The overall contribution of friction to the dynamics of the first "moments" of the collision (the first full rotation of the galactic masses around each other) is likely small - even for the baryonic matter.
As an example, the Earth is moving through space and encountering friction. But no enough to drive us to a lower orbit around the sun any time soon. And the primary component of Lunar friction as it orbits the Earth are due to the tidal effects - the friction occurs with the tides at our coastlines.
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
38
Views
6K
Replies
65
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top