Question on angular momentum of triplet and singlet wavefunctions

  • Thread starter The_Foetus
  • Start date
  • #1
Hi, I'm relatively new to QM so just a basic explanation of my problem would be amazing!

I'm doing some internet research on superfluidity over my summer holiday, and was looking specifically at 3He, and the way it forms Cooper pairs. Having read a classical analogy to why the relative angular momentum of the two He atoms must not be 0, I then read that this excludes the possibility of having the wavefunction (|+,-> - |-,+>)/√2, where + and - represent up and down spin respectively.

This leaves then a possible triplet wavefunction of
ψ = a*|+,+> + b*(|+,-> + |-,+>)/√2 + c*|-,->
where a, b, c are constants.

My question is why the |+,-> + |-,+> state has a non-zero angular momentum, but the |+,-> - |-,+> state has l = 0.

Simple question I know, but would really appreciate an explanation.
Regards,
Foetus
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
atyy
Science Advisor
13,978
2,257
Last edited:
  • #3
Meir Achuz
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
3,529
109
My question is why the |+,-> + |-,+> state has a non-zero angular momentum, but the |+,-> - |-,+> state has l = 0.
The raising operator J_+ gives zero when acting on that state.
 
  • #4
Avodyne
Science Advisor
1,396
88
But that's not enough information to conclude that the total angular momentum is zero. (In QM jargon, not intended for the OP, J_+ annihilates any state with m=+j.)

However, it's also true that J_x, J_y, and J_z all give zero when acting on this state. So it is an eigenstate of each component of the angular momentum operator with eigenvalue zero.
 

Related Threads on Question on angular momentum of triplet and singlet wavefunctions

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
17K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
458
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
800
Top