This is not homework.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I have problem deriving the solution for cylinder with radial symmetry given:

[tex] \nabla^2U(\rho,z)=R''+\frac{1}{\rho}R'+\frac{Z''}{Z}=0[/tex]

Which give [itex] \rho^2 R''+ \rho R' -k\rho^2 R=0 \hbox { and } Z''+kZ=0[/itex]

With given boundary conditions [itex] U(\rho,0) = U(\rho,h) =0 \hbox { for } \rho<a \hbox{ and } U(a,z) = f(z)[/itex]

The book claimed [itex]k=-\lambda^2 = -ve[/itex] can only produce trivial solution of R. I cannot verify this.

k=-ve give [itex]\rho^2 R''+ \rho R' +\lambda^2 R=0[/itex]

This is parametric Bessel's equation of order zero which give [itex]R(\rho)=c_1 J_0(\lambda_n\rho) + c_2 Y_0(\lambda_n\rho)[/itex]

R(0) is bounded [itex] \Rightarrow c_2 = 0 \Rightarrow R(\rho)= c_1 J_0(\lambda_n\rho)[/itex]

That's where I get stuck. I cannot rule this out [itex] R(\rho)= c_1 J_0(\lambda_n\rho)[/itex] as a solution with the given boundary condition.

The book claimed only k=+ve would give solution. Please give me some suggestion.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Question on Dirichlet problem in cylinder with radial symmetry.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**