Question on height of a jump in terms of Power (from WPE chapter, JEE level)

  • Thread starter Thread starter annjee212
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the height of a jump in terms of power, specifically within the context of work and energy principles. Participants are exploring the relationship between power, velocity, and height in a physics problem related to jumping mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the power formula and its implications for calculating height. Questions arise regarding the interpretation of velocity in relation to average versus instantaneous values. There is also a consideration of how work is transformed into kinetic energy during the jump.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants questioning the assumptions made in the problem statement and the formulas used. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of average velocity and its impact on the calculations. However, there is no explicit consensus on the correctness of the provided answer or the assumptions involved.

Contextual Notes

There are uncertainties regarding the definitions of variables in the problem, particularly the meaning of 's' as it relates to the center of mass and the conditions under which the jump occurs. Participants are also considering the implications of constant acceleration during the jump.

annjee212
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
How do we find the height at which a man can jump in terms of P,s, m and g; given the maximum power as 'P' and the distance of centre of mass of man from ground as 's'
Relevant Equations
P = F x v or P = W/t.
I used the formula P = 1/2 mv^2/t. Then multiplied by s on both sides to get P.s = 1/2 x mv^2/t x s
==> P.s = 1/2mv^3 and then expressed v = root(2gh) and equated.
BUT I Got h = (1/2g) x (2sP/m)^2/3 but the answer is h = (1/2g) x (4sP/m)^2/3
Any idea where I am going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does ##\large \frac s t## give you the velocity of the man just at the instant he leaves the ground or does it give you the average velocity of the center of mass of the man during the time interval ##t##?
 
TSny said:
Does ##\large \frac s t## give you the velocity of the man just at the instant he leaves the ground or does it give you the average velocity of the center of mass of the man during the time interval ##t##?
Ohh well thank you, it gives the latter part. But then wouldnt it be (s/t)/2 right? And then we rightly get 4 in the numerator. Yep, thanks!
 
annjee212 said:
Ohh well thank you, it gives the latter part. But then wouldnt it be (s/t)/2 right? And then we rightly get 4 in the numerator. Yep, thanks!
Yes, s/t is the average velocity. If you can assume the acceleration of the center of mass is constant during the jump, then the average velocity during the jump is equal to half the velocity at the instant of leaving the ground. I think that's what you meant.

But I'm not sure the answer that was given is correct. If P = W/t, where W is the work done by the man in jumping, then this work does not get entirely transformed into kinetic energy. Some of the work goes into lifting the center of mass of the man while jumping. The answer given doesn't take this into account.
 
Something else that's confusing is that the problem statement says s is the "distance of the center of mass of the man from the ground". I think they probably meant to say that s is the vertical displacement of the center of mass of the man during the jump (until his feet leave the ground).
 
annjee212 said:
I used the formula P = 1/2 mv^2/t.
What is v here? What is the man's velocity at the start? What is the velocity at maximum height?

You quote P=Fv. We can take P as constant, since it is the limiting constraint. I would expand F and solve to find height as a function of time, but there might be an easier way.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
8K